| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 101
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1403 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I am trying a hot fix on the *.pdbqt files by applying this: I was thinking about a hotfix too, but it makes no sense, cause you have to fix it for the wingman too.# grep -l ^ATOM" 62 " *.pdbqt && echo HOT FIX && sed -i 's/^ATOM 62 /ATOM 62 /' $(grep -l ^ATOM" 62 " *.pdbqt) Yes, it works! Your returned task will wait for ever in Pending Validation state. |
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Recently Active Project Badges:
|
I am trying a hot fix on the *.pdbqt files by applying this: I was thinking about a hotfix too, but it makes no sense, cause you have to fix it for the wingman too.# grep -l ^ATOM" 62 " *.pdbqt && echo HOT FIX && sed -i 's/^ATOM 62 /ATOM 62 /' $(grep -l ^ATOM" 62 " *.pdbqt) Yes, it works! Your returned task will wait for ever in Pending Validation state. Adri |
||
|
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 1317 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There is one really irritating issue caused by that bad batch -- it only takes one error to stop the reliable host rating for an application, so as soon as one of those crops up none of the subsequent tasks dealt with by the server will be able to validate without a wingman until a stream of (I think) 10 consecutive successful returns; and, of course, somewhere in the next 10 tasks would be another bad one!
Cheers - Al. |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12594 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I am getting lots of these atom number 62 errors and seeing all copies failing with the same error. This is a waste of everyone's crunching time, but there is so little out there to crunch that I am reverting to one machine until something happens.
Mike |
||
|
|
TPCBF
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 2, 2011 Post Count: 2173 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yeah, all WUs of that particular batch are bad, all crap out as soon as they are being started. Luckily, it is ONLY a waste of a bit of bandwidth, but then at the same time, the overall well of MCM1 WUs has run dry too.
Let's see what the days brings... Ralf |
||
|
|
AgrFan
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 17, 2008 Post Count: 396 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
These errors would have been caught if Krembil was doing Alpha testing.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by AgrFan at May 16, 2023 1:56:53 PM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yeah, all WUs of that particular batch are bad, all crap out as soon as they are being started. Luckily, it is ONLY a waste of a bit of bandwidth, but then at the same time, the overall well of MCM1 WUs has run dry too. Let's see what the days brings... Ralf Not only MCM but the other projects too. As far as I can tell nothing is going out, at least for the moment. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
TPCBF
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 2, 2011 Post Count: 2173 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yeah, all WUs of that particular batch are bad, all crap out as soon as they are being started. Luckily, it is ONLY a waste of a bit of bandwidth, but then at the same time, the overall well of MCM1 WUs has run dry too. Let's see what the days brings... Ralf Not only MCM but the other projects too. As far as I can tell nothing is going out, at least for the moment. Cheers OPN[1,G] is on known hiatus, so no surprise here (though I got a single OPN1 _2 WU the other day) and HST, despite being designated an "active" project (while SCC is still designated "intermittent") has been the equivalent of Unobtainium since before the move. The only thing that has always been in ample supply by WCG towers has been the lack of communication... Ralf |
||
|
|
bfmorse
Senior Cruncher US Joined: Jul 26, 2009 Post Count: 442 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thought, or rather hoped, the issues with SCC atom 62 faults had been resolved. So I re-enabled one of my smaller system’s profiles but, the first SCC barely out of the gate faulted.
----------------------------------------Therefore, until Krembil lets us know that the issues with SCC’s atom “62 “ have, indeed, been fixed SCC processing with my computers has and will remain offline! If it is easier to sort through through the WU’s by processing them, perhaps you have an available computer that can be used to do so until the backlog of faulty WU’s have been cleared. According to my log entry (see above), we only get one WU per day when that happens. You have my email address if you wish to discuss this further. ETA: since there is reported movement in valid WU's, I'll put the smaller systems back online and see how they go. [Edit 1 times, last edit by bfmorse at May 18, 2023 4:22:18 PM] |
||
|
|
tullio
Cruncher Joined: May 31, 2020 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline |
All tasks seem to fail on different computers. Devs?
|
||
|
|
|