Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 16
Posts: 16   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4401 times and has 15 replies Next Thread
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher
England
Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Post Count: 12594
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Manually control order of workunits

Max_concurrent does not control the queue. It only controls the numbers crunching.

The bug must be elsewhere - my guess is that that the projected time for the units is being underestimated and the cache settings therefore produce large numbers of units.

Project Limits should be set to 1 more than the max_concurrent to avoid that problem.

Mike
[Aug 14, 2021 6:13:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
leloft
Cruncher
Joined: Jun 8, 2017
Post Count: 23
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Manually control order of workunits

Project Limits should be set to 1 more than the max_concurrent to avoid that problem.
It's not that straightforward:
the shared profile was set to 2 ARP, 2 OPN and 1 MCM, with a work cache of 1 day.
but still boinc was able to download >100 ARP units and >200 OPN/MCM. This suggests that the device profile was overridden.
The bug must be elsewhere - my guess is that that the projected time for the units is being underestimated and the cache settings therefore produce large numbers of units.
300 work units for a 1 day cache would approximate to (~300 units = 24h) an average unit est time of approx. 5 mins, or an underestimate of about 2 orders of magnitude. Is this within the margin of error for the CPU benchmarks?
I don't think that this is an app_config bug, simply because the overloaded cache arose in the absence of an app_config.xml.
[Aug 14, 2021 10:23:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher
England
Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Post Count: 12594
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Manually control order of workunits

There are 2 cache settings. What was the other? Try setting them to 0.3/0.3.

Mike
[Aug 15, 2021 1:02:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
leloft
Cruncher
Joined: Jun 8, 2017
Post Count: 23
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Manually control order of workunits

There are 2 cache settings. What was the other? Try setting them to 0.3/0.3
The only two cache settings under the heading are:
Workunit Cache Settings
Connect to network about every ........... 0.1.......days
Cache.............1.0.......extra days of work.
How is the frequency of connecting to the server going to prevent the software downloading huge excesses of work?
I have seen reference to the min/max in other posts. Where are these min/max settings to be found please?
[Aug 15, 2021 3:51:17 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher
England
Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Post Count: 12594
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Manually control order of workunits

That is it. The first is the min and the second is the max additional.
[Aug 15, 2021 10:42:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
maeax
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: May 2, 2007
Post Count: 144
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Manually control order of workunits

@leloft.
(store at least 0.5 days of work) and
(store up to an additional 0.0 days of work).
No app_config for me.
Profile (home, school or work)- with ARP (two tasks), all other Projects unlimited and active.
Never get a problem of too many tasks downloaded in the past!
The balance for work from Boinc (WCG) is perfect!
----------------------------------------
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores/ AMD Radeon (TM) Pro W6600. OS Win11pro
[Aug 16, 2021 8:03:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 16   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread