Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 781
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Richard Haselgrove
Senior Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Feb 19, 2021 Post Count: 360 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() |
Trying to load up a second high-throughput Linux machine, but got these messages from the server - I haven't seen the second from other projects.
----------------------------------------27/04/2021 16:38:05 | World Community Grid | No tasks are available for OpenPandemics - COVID 19 27/04/2021 16:38:05 | World Community Grid | Tasks are committed to other platforms [Edit 1 times, last edit by Richard Haselgrove at Apr 27, 2021 3:43:02 PM] |
||
|
m0320174
Cruncher Joined: Feb 13, 2021 Post Count: 11 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks! So I am not alone. So if I understand correctly, I would need much more CPU power for a task to keep the GPU busy all the time. (Or maybe it is even impossible?). I'm not sure if it's possible to continuously max out your GPU. I see 2 reasons why it can be a challenge: 1. the CPU needs to "prep" the workunit before the GPU can actually start to work on it. During this time your GPU is completely idle (as mentioned above). 2. if you have a powerful GPU then 1 workunit will not max out your GPU Some people run multiple GPU workunits in parallel even if they only have 1 GPU. I have not experimented with this. |
||
|
goben_2003
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 16, 2006 Post Count: 145 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does the continous disk writing i see people complaining about happen for temporary files? I'm not experiencing it, but i have my temporary folder (tmp) mounted in ramdisk through tmpfs, and i only see on the SSD the occasional "dumps" of data, every few minutes. Can this be it? I wouldn't worry about it. the fears of SSD writes are largely FUD and blown out of proportion. most modern SSDs can handle PETABYTES of writes before failure is a concern and they have more advanced wear leveling than earlier SSDs. that's continuous writing for 10+ years in most cases. and real world use will be far below that. Sorry Ian-n-Steve, I am going to have to disagree. It is not FUD or blown out of proportion. I think that there is a very wide distribution of total writes ratings across SSDs. Using the samsung 860 2tb and crucial mx500 2tb as examples: Total bytes written ratings: samsung: 2400 TB(2.4PB) crucial: 700 TB max MB/s to reach 10 years: samsung: ~7.61 crucial: ~2.22 Some people are seeing higher writes than either of those SSDs are rated for to last 10 years. I do not currently have server grade SSDs like nanoprobe has. There is a reason I run boinc off of a ramdisk these days - and it is not FUD. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Grumpy Swede
Master Cruncher Svíþjóð Joined: Apr 10, 2020 Post Count: 2186 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, the biggies are starting to validate for me now.
|
||
|
William Albert
Cruncher Joined: Apr 5, 2020 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A few things I've noticed during this test on my machines:
----------------------------------------
Overall, a fun test so far. ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by William Albert at Apr 27, 2021 4:34:58 PM] |
||
|
JohnDK
Advanced Cruncher Denmark Joined: Feb 17, 2010 Post Count: 77 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Don't know how often it happens, but I've noticed several times those 5 digit WUs reach around 50% progress and then jump back to 0% and continues. Is that normal behaviour?
----------------------------------------
Intel i7-6850K / 16GB / RTX 3090 / 2x RTX 3080 Ti / RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X / 32GB / RTX 2080 Ti |
||
|
Andyman
Cruncher Joined: Apr 9, 2021 Post Count: 17 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() |
Don't know how often it happens, but I've noticed several times those 5 digit WUs reach around 50% progress and then jump back to 0% and continues. Is that normal behaviour? Yeah the % seems wonky atm. Goes up and down but the timer stays the same? It finishes as normal it seems. |
||
|
goben_2003
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 16, 2006 Post Count: 145 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I wish that were the case still for me! I finished the last Nvidia GPU WUs an hour ago, now I only have and get Intel WUs. Not complaining though, I was crunching several at a time before. ![]() |
||
|
gordonbb
Cruncher Canada Joined: May 14, 2019 Post Count: 19 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry Ian-n-Steve, I am going to have to disagree. It is not FUD or blown out of proportion. I think that there is a very wide distribution of total writes ratings across SSDs. Using the samsung 860 2tb and crucial mx500 2tb as examples: The other option with consumer grade SSDs is to use the software from the manufacturer to "over-provision" the space reserved on the SSD for wear-leveling. You start out with a smaller effective disk size but, in theory, it will last longer.Total bytes written ratings: samsung: 2400 TB(2.4PB) crucial: 700 TB max MB/s to reach 10 years: samsung: ~7.61 crucial: ~2.22 Some people are seeing higher writes than either of those SSDs are rated for to last 10 years. I do not currently have server grade SSDs like nanoprobe has. There is a reason I run boinc off of a ramdisk these days - and it is not FUD. Here is a good article from Samsung on this subject ![]() AMD - 2600x, 2 x 2700, 2700x, 3900x, 3950x, 2 x 5900x, 5950x Intel - E3-1231v3, 9900K NVidia - GTX 1060 6GB, 1660ti, 1070ti; RTX 2060, 2060s, 2070a, 5 x 2070s |
||
|
spRocket
Senior Cruncher Joined: Mar 25, 2020 Post Count: 274 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Don't know how often it happens, but I've noticed several times those 5 digit WUs reach around 50% progress and then jump back to 0% and continues. Is that normal behaviour? Yeah the % seems wonky atm. Goes up and down but the timer stays the same? It finishes as normal it seems. The jump back is where the CPU hands the work off to the GPU and the real crunching begins. I'm using the boinctui-extended text user interface to manage multiple systems, and it also shows the switchover by changing its memory usage value from something reasonable to 40+ GB, which is more memory than I have in the machine and GPU combined. That might be some sort of bug in the TUI, but it does indicate when the GPU is doing the actual work. |
||
|
|
![]() |