| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: OpenPandemics - COVID-19 Project
Thread: What's the highest batch you have received? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3771
|
|
| Author |
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
OPN1_0042688_00084
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12565 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
42702
|
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
OPN1_0042707_00966
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12565 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
42806
|
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12565 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
42835
|
||
|
|
Dayle Diamond
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 31, 2013 Post Count: 452 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
We've done a thousand batches in the last four days.
If we maintain this rate, the last batch of the first experiment will be sent in 28 days. If we return to our prior speed, we'll reach that milestone by June 30th. |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12565 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
42849
|
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12565 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Dayle
Until 16000, the average interval was about 10 days per 1000. Then we had a hiatus when a load of batches were returned to the scientists. From 17000 to 29000 the average was about 4.4 days per 1000. Then from 29000 to 41000 it was averaging about 9.6 days. My forecasts are based on the last 10 intervals which would automatically adjust slowly to the latest rate. However, if we get 3 consecutive intervals at a new rate, I adjust my formula to be based from the point of change which would in this case be 41000. Throughout this whole time there has been very little change to the number of results returned, so other factors have caused these changes which have not been advised to us crunchers. Mike |
||
|
|
Dayle Diamond
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 31, 2013 Post Count: 452 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Mike,
I agree with your earlier post that GPU workunits seem to be pulling work from this experiment. If the researchers make a second experiment available to GPUs instead, we may return to the old rate. The last speedup ended. This speedup could end. So I find it useful to make two predictions. What happens if the current rate continues, and what happens if the current speedup ends. |
||
|
|
Krzysztof_F
Senior Cruncher Poland Joined: Nov 15, 2007 Post Count: 176 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
OPN1_0043232_01082
|
||
|
|
|