| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 2
|
|
| Author |
|
|
AlEdlund
Cruncher Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Post Count: 1 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I searched for a list of known "bugs" relative to memory performance and was unable to find it, if this is a repeat I apologize. I just upgraded my system to 3G of memory and the device information now shows it as having 0Mb, but 300% when compared to the average.
running WinXP Pro x64, P4-D (830) |
||
|
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I searched for a list of known "bugs" relative to memory performance and was unable to find it, if this is a repeat I apologize. I just upgraded my system to 3G of memory and the device information now shows it as having 0Mb, but 300% when compared to the average. It may take a few cycles to get everything recognized, and it may not check with each cycle. I think the cutoff is also 300%. That's as high as you can get for individual items and overall. The processor score does not recognize all newer systems, either. The AMD64 3400+ and 4000+ over here are both getting around 235 max with nothing else going on in the computer. running WinXP Pro x64, P4-D (830)
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 2 times, last edit by retsof at Oct 12, 2005 4:13:32 PM] |
||
|
|
|