Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2223 times and has 5 replies Next Thread
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher
The Great State of Texas
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 1054
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Points lower?

Has anyone else noticed starting 31 May a drop in points.
Not that it really matters. I was getting 1.8M pts for 21k results now getting 900k.

Just asking to see if I have a issue on my end.
Thanks

coffee
cowboy
----------------------------------------

[Jun 4, 2017 4:53:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Points lower?

Is it instead of getting 100-200-300-400 per hour credit*7 as being observed, now lower for the shorts and closer to what other WCG projects on average dole out, then you've got an im-matter-ial problem. ;)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Jun 4, 2017 10:09:13 AM]
[Jun 4, 2017 10:08:38 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1403
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Points lower?

Is it instead of getting 100-200-300-400 per hour credit*7 as being observed, now lower for the shorts and closer to what other WCG projects on average dole out, then you've got an im-matter-ial problem. ;)

You're right, I think. It's most remarkable for the short running FAHV's

See the following tasks from May 23rd and from today:

FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21274_ 0--	5/23/17 19:38:23	0.05 / 0.05	14.7 / 8.9
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21290_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.06 / 0.06 17.8 / 10.8
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21277_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.07 / 0.07 22.3 / 13.9
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21291_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.06 / 0.06 18.6 / 12.3
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 20936_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.03 / 0.03 10.6 / 6.8
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21114_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.04 / 0.04 11.5 / 7.0
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21038_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.06 / 0.06 20.2 / 13.0
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21665_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.05 / 0.05 15.4 / 9.6
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21411_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.06 / 0.06 17.7 / 10.6
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21403_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.05 / 0.05 15.2 / 15.2
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21414_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.04 / 0.04 12.9 / 8.6
FAHV_ 1006269_ 3j3q-_ t-P4_ 21405_ 0-- 5/23/17 19:38:23 0.05 / 0.05 15.2 / 15.2


FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 18276_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:29 0.05 / 0.05 4.3 / 4.3
FAHV_ 1001723_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 12266_ 1-- 6-4-2017 11:29 0.05 / 0.05 3.7 / 3.7
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19296_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:27 0.06 / 0.06 4.6 / 4.6
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 18291_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:27 0.02 / 0.02 1.4 / 1.4
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19133_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:25 0.05 / 0.05 3.8 / 3.8
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19291_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:25 0.05 / 0.05 3.8 / 3.8
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19349_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:25 0.06 / 0.06 4.3 / 4.3
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19357_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:23 0.06 / 0.06 4.3 / 4.3
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 18279_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:23 0.06 / 0.06 4.8 / 4.8
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 18262_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:23 0.04 / 0.04 3.3 / 3.3
FAHV_ 1001723_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 12263_ 1-- 6-4-2017 11:23 0.05 / 0.05 4.2 / 4.2
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19293_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:20 0.06 / 0.06 4.8 / 4.8
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 19617_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:18 0.05 / 0.05 3.8 / 3.8
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 18159_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:18 0.05 / 0.06 4.3 / 4.3
FAHV_ 1001725_ 3j3q-8O-P2_ 18180_ 0-- 6-4-2017 11:18 0.08 / 0.08 6.5 / 6.5

[Jun 4, 2017 11:37:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher
The Great State of Texas
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 1054
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Points lower?

Thanks for the answers.

Nothing wrong on my end then.

coffee
cowboy
----------------------------------------

[Jun 4, 2017 4:25:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Points lower?

Is it instead of getting 100-200-300-400 per hour credit*7 as being observed, now lower for the shorts and closer to what other WCG projects on average dole out, then you've got an im-matter-ial problem. ;)

This post contains the kicker to which the credit system responded... much smaller high-low runtime differential.
[Jun 5, 2017 8:37:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher
The Great State of Texas
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 1054
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Points lower?

I've noticed that also. While my Rigid went from 40 min down to 7 min.
My main point loss was the non-Rigid WU's (like Crystal showed).

I'm still running FAAH for my 50yr badge. I just thought I had a problem when points started to drop. I guess they changed to WU's a little. Or maybe they were never suppose to get the Higher reward and are now normal.

coffee
cowboy
----------------------------------------

[Jun 5, 2017 1:15:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread