| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7851 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I was just reading this article and thought here they go again. Trying to figure out how to squeeze a little more money out of the customers and lock them into a particular environment. Apple does this with their closed system and now Micro$oft is basically doing the same thing. Both companies reek of greed in their respective fields. Not that they do not make good products, which they do, but trying to lock everyone into their systems is just greedy. I don't want to give anybody any ideas, but it is almost the same as buying a car and after a certain period time the car manufacturer will eventually send out a software update to disable your car because your model is not compatible with their new systems or they deem it too much trouble to keep making them work. Thank goodness there are open source alternatives. My hat is off to those developers who put in a lot of time, sweat, blood and tears into softwear offerings so we do not have to be tied into offerings from only one source.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
NAP2614
Master Cruncher Joined: Mar 27, 2007 Post Count: 2546 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It is amazing how one corporation can affect the livelihood of so many different folk, world wide. Us little one horse operations just slide quietly into Linux Mint Libre, on a majority of our devices, saving one little Dell with i3 duo to run the excellent programs that work properly only on MS. I cannot fathom the disturbance MS causes to call centers with 1200 workstations.
----------------------------------------Cheers ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
In terms of larger corporations the move makes sense. A larger corporation in this scenario has really two options.
1) plan to upgrade at a reasonable pace (unless they switch to a different OS or Office product they WILL upgrade it's just a question of when) Or 2) Utilize in-house servers for the services affected and continue as before. Both options are entirely viable for large corporations and each has benefits and drawbacks. The biggest benefit for Microsoft is not having to retain older versions of their products on the servers providing these services and potentially leaving themselves vulnerable to bugs in versions beyond their end of life period. Remember how people didn't want to get rid of XP? Large companies were the same way, and the ones with big contracts got to keep it longer than anyone else and still get support. It's totally reasonable for MS to not want that situation going on in their cloud environment. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Personal opinion is that cloud services are better for small to medium sized businesses, and large Fortune 500's should be using their own infrastructure anyway.
|
||
|
|
|