Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 4
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2460 times and has 3 replies Next Thread
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7851
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Micro$oft does it again

I was just reading this article and thought here they go again. Trying to figure out how to squeeze a little more money out of the customers and lock them into a particular environment. Apple does this with their closed system and now Micro$oft is basically doing the same thing. Both companies reek of greed in their respective fields. Not that they do not make good products, which they do, but trying to lock everyone into their systems is just greedy. I don't want to give anybody any ideas, but it is almost the same as buying a car and after a certain period time the car manufacturer will eventually send out a software update to disable your car because your model is not compatible with their new systems or they deem it too much trouble to keep making them work. Thank goodness there are open source alternatives. My hat is off to those developers who put in a lot of time, sweat, blood and tears into softwear offerings so we do not have to be tied into offerings from only one source.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Apr 26, 2017 12:13:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
NAP2614
Master Cruncher
Joined: Mar 27, 2007
Post Count: 2546
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Micro$oft does it again

It is amazing how one corporation can affect the livelihood of so many different folk, world wide. Us little one horse operations just slide quietly into Linux Mint Libre, on a majority of our devices, saving one little Dell with i3 duo to run the excellent programs that work properly only on MS. I cannot fathom the disturbance MS causes to call centers with 1200 workstations.

Cheers
----------------------------------------

[Apr 26, 2017 3:33:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Micro$oft does it again

In terms of larger corporations the move makes sense. A larger corporation in this scenario has really two options.

1) plan to upgrade at a reasonable pace (unless they switch to a different OS or Office product they WILL upgrade it's just a question of when)

Or

2) Utilize in-house servers for the services affected and continue as before.

Both options are entirely viable for large corporations and each has benefits and drawbacks.

The biggest benefit for Microsoft is not having to retain older versions of their products on the servers providing these services and potentially leaving themselves vulnerable to bugs in versions beyond their end of life period. Remember how people didn't want to get rid of XP? Large companies were the same way, and the ones with big contracts got to keep it longer than anyone else and still get support. It's totally reasonable for MS to not want that situation going on in their cloud environment.
[Apr 26, 2017 9:54:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Micro$oft does it again

Personal opinion is that cloud services are better for small to medium sized businesses, and large Fortune 500's should be using their own infrastructure anyway.
[Apr 26, 2017 10:01:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread