| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Stop TB
Thread: HSTB units all erroring |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 28
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Jean-David Beyer
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Oct 2, 2007 Post Count: 339 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I gave up on running HSTB exclusively, so my machine runs most WCG tasks, climateprediction, rosetta, and seti@home. I have a 4-core Xeon processor, 64-bit. For August, I have received only these work units.
----------------------------------------11-Aug-2017 12:28:57 [World Community Grid] Starting task HST1_012881_000076_MC0011_T001_F00069_S00021_1 using hst1 version 726 in slot 4 21-Aug-2017 19:47:23 [World Community Grid] Starting task HST1_013066_000050_MC0028_T000_F00039_S00031_1 using hst1 version 726 in slot 0  |
||
|
|
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Jun 5, 2009 Post Count: 978 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I only have one windows machine (win 7) but It seems to error these
----------------------------------------"Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x76EEA2E1 read attempt to address 0x00C39000 " I'd be happy to hear from someone who can give me a hint on a fix for this. intel 4c8t machine with 8G that currently tells me 2.5G is available Runs everything else OK  |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Just a couple of suggestions:
----------------------------------------Reset the project Reboot the machine Do a memory test Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
RTorpey
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Aug 24, 2005 Post Count: 67 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Another possibility - are all your CPU's Intel or some AMD?
HSTB has problems with AMD CPU's. |
||
|
|
sohleks
Cruncher Joined: Sep 29, 2017 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I got a workunit today that is at 3.8% complete after 4.5 hours with my 3.2 GHz intel cpu. Never seen one from HSTB require that long before. I'm worried if I give it the 100+ hours it might error out 😅
----------------------------------------Anyone else get a super slow one like that? Take your bets. Legit, or doomed workunit? [Edit 1 times, last edit by sohleks at Jan 26, 2018 7:30:42 AM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I got a workunit today that is at 3.8% complete after 4.5 hours with my 3.2 GHz intel cpu. Never seen one from HSTB require that long before. I'm worried if I give it the 100+ hours it might error out 😅 Anyone else get a super slow one like that? Take your bets. Legit, or doomed workunit? With a work unit like that I would first try rebooting my system to see if it is just stuck. If it continues to try to run super slow like it has been, I would abort it. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Seems to be quite a bit of variation in the WU's being sent out at the moment. I've got 3 valid results in my returned list right now and they've all got pretty different times.
9.42hrs 1.93hrs 11.74hrs |
||
|
|
sohleks
Cruncher Joined: Sep 29, 2017 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I extended the hibernate timer on my computer to make sure I can finish it in the week deadline. And when I woke up today it is gone. Its been sent in and validated at just under 8 hours of cpu time. I suppose it was just the progress bar being silly.
|
||
|
|
|