| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Hardware Chat Room
Thread: xeon relative performance 1366/v1/v2/v3/v4 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 17
|
|
| Author |
|
|
thunder7
Senior Cruncher Netherlands Joined: Mar 6, 2013 Post Count: 241 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Are those PPD numbers per cpu or per system?
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by thunder7 at Jan 22, 2017 8:20:56 AM] |
||
|
|
fuzzydice555
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Mar 25, 2015 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
The 2660 is a 2 cpu system so points are for 2 cpus. All others are single cpu.
----------------------------------------Power consumption is for the whole system, measured at the wall.  |
||
|
|
mmonnin
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jul 20, 2016 Post Count: 148 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
There is a lot of data available in WUProp:
----------------------------------------http://wuprop.boinc-af.org/results/projet.py?...on=Mapping+Cancer+Markers  |
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
1366 is old technology I would suggest you pass on. Newer chips are more proficient. I still crunch with dual 5670's. One of these days I will sell it and get a newer system. With single chip cores getting higher, not really advantageous to build a dual configuration, unless you have money burning a hole in your pocket. AMD just announced there new server chips to give intel a run for there money. Am waiting on prices to decide. A 16 core/32 thread monster would be great to crunch with.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
 |
||
|
|
thunder7
Senior Cruncher Netherlands Joined: Mar 6, 2013 Post Count: 241 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well. so far, a dual Xeon V4-2698 ES (2x 20 cores/40 threads, running @ 2.3 GHz) vs a quad Opteron 6282SE (4x 16 cores/16 threads, running @2.6 GHz):
day 1: xeon 298k points, opteron 236k day 2: xeon 260k points, opteron 190k day 3: xeon 291k points, opteron 205k But, the xeon machine uses about 300W in total - the opteron machine uses 750W. Noise levels are incomparable, the xeon machine is barely heard, the opteron one has a SuperMicro chassis, which even with quieter fans makes a lot of noise. I think I'll keep them both - just over 1000 results per day makes me very happy. |
||
|
|
thunder7
Senior Cruncher Netherlands Joined: Mar 6, 2013 Post Count: 241 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It seems it was still ramping up then, the numbers now are
day 1 xeon 316 kPoints / 653 results, opteron 216 kPoints / 360 results day 2 xeon 322 kPoints / 648 results, opteron 221 kPoints / 412 results day 3 xeon 310 kPoints / 621 results, opteron 216 kPoints / 407 results I'm very happy with that. The xeon is about 50% faster overall in points, and the ratio points/result looks a bit better too. |
||
|
|
fuzzydice555
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Mar 25, 2015 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Welcome to the v4 team, you now have a top of the line cruncher :)
----------------------------------------The Xeon is 3.4 times more efficient, that's a huge leap! [Edit 1 times, last edit by fuzzydice555 at Feb 17, 2017 8:30:38 AM] |
||
|
|
|