Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 44
Posts: 44   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 9575 times and has 43 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

OMG, I see what you mean!
[May 26, 2016 5:43:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

The fiction... and the facts: https://bit.ly/WCGCPH1

Try petitioning uplinger to port the sniftiness he recently applied to HST one, to address the undercrediting of runtime 'outliers', but it's just not as bad as it is made out to be, on average, in contra to the fiction, the facts show there's the last week(s) been a strong convergence of all sciences towards the 26-27 credit per hour average mark. Possibly a factor in this issue is/was the speed disparity between the *nux based platforms (10% or so of contribution and twice as fast as 90% done Windows]

Given that a large portion of the office crunching resource went missing in the last weeks and months [an uncovered certificate issue], the averages might go down again. cool
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at May 26, 2016 6:02:07 PM]
[May 26, 2016 5:59:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18667
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

That's great that the sciences are converging on the same average credit per hour. Seems like that it should be that way. As I recall though, vina makes getting a new project up and running much faster and easier. Sure can't blame the scientists or admins for using it. However, over the years, we've seen that it is best suited for projects with highly homogeneous WUs. When the WUs start having increasingly varying run times, we start seeing the credits given drop off for the outliers. If what Keith did for the TB outlier issue could be ported to Zika, that would be great but I didn't think TB was vina-based.
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[May 26, 2016 9:57:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jmps
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Post Count: 13
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

I though Zika was VINA based?

Vina. See what the error says:
Error: could not open ".\ZINC12591756.pdbqt" for reading.
VINA failed. rc = 1. Exiting
[May 26, 2016 10:24:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pvh513
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
Post Count: 260
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

but at least look on the bright side - at least the long units are not erroring any more (so far).


I have one of those very long units, and it is still erroring out. They all get error -131 "file size too big". Is this from before the fix, and if so why hasn't it been removed from the database?

ZIKA_ 000001186_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ wRNAand2Mn_ chnA_ 0309_ 4-- Linux 4.1.15-8-default 705 Error 5/28/16 10:33:05 5/29/16 19:33:04 23.52 396.2 / 0.0
ZIKA_ 000001186_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ wRNAand2Mn_ chnA_ 0309_ 3-- Linux 2.6.32-573.26.1.el6.x86_64 705 Error 5/27/16 04:05:50 5/28/16 10:32:50 15.29 148.8 / 0.0
ZIKA_ 000001186_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ wRNAand2Mn_ chnA_ 0309_ 2-- Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 - In Progress 5/27/16 04:05:31 5/30/16 16:05:31 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
ZIKA_ 000001186_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ wRNAand2Mn_ chnA_ 0309_ 1-- Linux 2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64 705 Error 5/26/16 03:30:34 5/27/16 04:05:18 23.95 29.8 / 0.0
ZIKA_ 000001186_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ wRNAand2Mn_ chnA_ 0309_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 705 Error 5/21/16 22:47:03 5/26/16 03:30:26 19.40 29.8 / 0.0
[May 29, 2016 7:39:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7847
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

I think these ultra long units are getting fewer and farther between. I initially saw a couple of these, but have not seen one now for several days. Most of these units should have been caught when Uplinger increased the acceptable file size, but perhaps these last units even exceed that. If it is not too much trouble, could you post the number of tasks in this unit ? My guess is it will exceed 300 tasks.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[May 29, 2016 8:06:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sandvika
Advanced Cruncher
United Kingdom
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 112
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

I'm only doing Zika on Android at the moment as I'm chasing my 10 year UGM badge before the project ends on Intel - and it's going to be close - how exciting! The low credit issue is affecting me too, not just for long WUs, which is why I'm making an appearance here smile

I had assumed that I've been getting very low credit for OET on Android because the devices are slow compared to Intel CPUs and thus both my Android devices had averaged out on this low level of credit having achieved reliability. If I'm wrong, it's probably a good thing that Zika is dragging the credit upwards by a factor of 4!

My device was the _3 re-issue on this WU.

Project Name: OpenZika
Created: 05/19/2016 21:26:18
Name: ZIKA_000000540_x1nb7_HCVJ4_RNAPol_JustProt_chnA_0033
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 2


Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
ZIKA_ 000000540_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ JustProt_ chnA_ 0033_ 3-- Android 3.4.0-5508620 (Android 5.0) 705 Valid 30/05/16 04:05:27 31/05/16 08:24:21 7.07 17.9 / 77.7
ZIKA_ 000000540_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ JustProt_ chnA_ 0033_ 2-- Android 3.0.21-00002-OMAP-Android 705 Error 30/05/16 03:42:47 30/05/16 04:04:58 0.00 27.7 / 0.0
ZIKA_ 000000540_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ JustProt_ chnA_ 0033_ 1-- Android 3.18.14-7538748 (Android 6.0.1) - No Reply 20/05/16 03:42:16 30/05/16 03:42:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
ZIKA_ 000000540_ x1nb7_ HCVJ4_ RNAPol_ JustProt_ chnA_ 0033_ 0-- Android 3.4.0-4445722 (Android 5.0) 705 Valid 20/05/16 03:42:05 22/05/16 12:00:08 9.01 137.5 / 77.7

----------------------------------------

[May 31, 2016 9:46:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

That's great that the sciences are converging on the same average credit per hour. Seems like that it should be that way. As I recall though, vina makes getting a new project up and running much faster and easier. Sure can't blame the scientists or admins for using it. However, over the years, we've seen that it is best suited for projects with highly homogeneous WUs. When the WUs start having increasingly varying run times, we start seeing the credits given drop off for the outliers. If what Keith did for the TB outlier issue could be ported to Zika, that would be great but I didn't think TB was vina-based.

Sadly, a week on the high variability continues to be a feeder for killing credit... Zika avg runtime at it's lowest since start, credit at lowest, convergence out the window. What though is a riddle is, why is FAHB with a fairly regular runtime the lowest? BEDAM is hard to crunch, but is that a reason to give least of all [ATM]... is it harder to crunch due inefficiency, thus putting through less fpops/mips, the base measure for credit? The crunching time is is still spend, no instrument available to determine what's running most efficient [but by measure of points]. Not the first time the question is asked... how to optimize the use of the pool resource? [Then really there needing to be a pool badge [argh], so total contribution is recognized 'visibly', instead of this constant emphasis on individual sciences.

Charts:
Credit/Hour https://bit.ly/WCGCPH1
Runtime/Result: https://bit.ly/WCGART1
[Jun 1, 2016 9:53:59 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7847
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

The crunching time is is still spend, no instrument available to determine what's running most efficient [but by measure of points]. Not the first time the question is asked... how to optimize the use of the pool resource?

Off topic alert.
A reasonable question which would really need some inside research by the techs. It would make sense to tailor the units to the hosts which are best suited for those units. Might make a good thesis for a masters level computer science student.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jun 1, 2016 10:31:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: super low credit for some super long Zika WU

\ot Think there's a working paper out there already, optimizing use of a non-homogeneous computing resource. Would have to dig, vaguely remembering knreed put a link out to the document in his previous tenure, possibly in places I can't go anymore /ot
[Jun 1, 2016 10:49:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 44   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread