Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 74
Posts: 74   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 14494 times and has 73 replies Next Thread
dango
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jul 27, 2009
Post Count: 307
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

Now we're down at 1% according to Research status.
More batches generated/predicted ?


ooo nice to see it on 1% :)
also CEP2 went down from 99%
[May 31, 2016 8:35:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KLiK
Master Cruncher
Croatia
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Post Count: 3108
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

CEP2 is down, 'cause of the re-release of science after successful BETAs!

OZ...well, techs, admins:
can we have a total batch number? is it still 19026 or has it changed?
;)
----------------------------------------
oldies:UDgrid.org & PS3 Life@home


non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia
[Jun 1, 2016 7:18:50 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

What part of 'initial' batch set do you not understand, click? How can the scientists possibly tell when 'how to progress' experiment input is based on previous experiment output, barely 2 weeks into the project? So, a number was plugged to go to an 'maybe' completion time, year(s) in the future, just as I've done in this threads OP and other crunching charts OPs, and not the first time pointed out to you!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Jun 1, 2016 8:10:26 AM]
[Jun 1, 2016 8:01:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mathilde2006
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: Sep 30, 2006
Post Count: 269
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

a.) it's Klik- not click
b.) calm down
c.) he just was asking, what's behind the change from 17 to 2%.
You must learn, to be friendly- even, when people ask same questions ever and ever again.
----------------------------------------

[Jun 1, 2016 10:44:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

'over and over' you might mean... eventually the friendly then says goodbye in less circumvent words ;o)

On topic, new Result record yesterday... 483K. Fresh chart is up.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Jun 1, 2016 10:59:55 AM]
[Jun 1, 2016 10:59:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KLiK
Master Cruncher
Croatia
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Post Count: 3108
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

What part of 'initial' batch set do you not understand, click? How can the scientists possibly tell when 'how to progress' experiment input is based on previous experiment output, barely 2 weeks into the project? So, a number was plugged to go to an 'maybe' completion time, year(s) in the future, just as I've done in this threads OP and other crunching charts OPs, and not the first time pointed out to you!

well, I still trust your data charts more than their estimates...talked about that more often here on forum, not going to repeat it...
even asked techs to change their way of calculation the ECD...which clearly doesn't work - apparently! even saying them how to do it & not look only last week of crunching as a based calc...
remember when we had issues with OET & short WUs?

btw, your post are saying that we passed 400K results per day & keeping it stronger & stronger...so why the % have dropped to 1% & now are on 2%?!
so asking them about the total number of batches & if it has been changes is viable question for me?
also, note that % have been going up from a day to a day...& now they dropped...so what's going on, again?

btw, I'm thinking about making a 7 Android crunching machine, connected with this:
- D-Link USB Hub DUB-H7, 7 ports
- Asonic USB Hub N-UH3702, 7 ports
so wandering is OZ is going to last, to be viable investment?!
----------------------------------------
oldies:UDgrid.org & PS3 Life@home


non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia
[Jun 1, 2016 11:33:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3294
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

What part of 'initial' batch set do you not understand, click? How can the scientists possibly tell when 'how to progress' experiment input is based on previous experiment output, barely 2 weeks into the project? So, a number was plugged to go to an 'maybe' completion time, year(s) in the future, just as I've done in this threads OP and other crunching charts OPs, and not the first time pointed out to you!

well, I still trust your data charts more than their estimates...talked about that more often here on forum, not going to repeat it...
even asked techs to change their way of calculation the ECD...which clearly doesn't work - apparently! even saying them how to do it & not look only last week of crunching as a based calc...
remember when we had issues with OET & short WUs?

btw, your post are saying that we passed 400K results per day & keeping it stronger & stronger...so why the % have dropped to 1% & now are on 2%?!
so asking them about the total number of batches & if it has been changes is viable question for me?
also, note that % have been going up from a day to a day...& now they dropped...so what's going on, again?

btw, I'm thinking about making a 7 Android crunching machine, connected with this:
- D-Link USB Hub DUB-H7, 7 ports
- Asonic USB Hub N-UH3702, 7 ports
so wandering is OZ is going to last, to be viable investment?!


It probably decreased to 2% because more work as added to the pipeline (doesn't necessarily mean more work beyond those 19026 batches). I think...
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jun 1, 2016 1:12:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

Downloaded one of batch 7253 right at noon of 19026 makes it 38.1% of known [purely linear, when above 12013 the batches are 1/10th the size]. On a 2 year timely, 2% what it shows now [this morning still 1%, dango saw that too yesterday, after having fast-tracked towards 20%] is now exactly [very coincidentally] matching the WCGPI number. Guess the Research page only shows the integer part, so 2.9999% would still show as 2%... it would have to as else 99.5% would print as 100% on the timeline, but then we've seen that too whilst work was still flowing ;O].

BTW, seem to recollect that the term 'loaded' was used, so we could be at 100% whilst there's weeks of work right before the feeder/transitioner gauge. :) (Reminds me of the Julie Christie/Donald Sutherland movie... 'Don't look now')
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Jun 1, 2016 1:45:20 PM]
[Jun 1, 2016 1:39:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
3A4scLiRhJVcdT2K9q9kQNxzxYJ9
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Nov 16, 2009
Post Count: 72
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart


btw, I'm thinking about making a 7 Android crunching machine, connected with this:
- D-Link USB Hub DUB-H7, 7 ports
- Asonic USB Hub N-UH3702, 7 ports
so wandering is OZ is going to last, to be viable investment?!



KliK, I suggest, you don't(!!) go with this kind of device because the specs say:

***
Supplied Charging Current

Standard Mode:
All seven USB ports- 0.5 A per port 2
Fast-Charge Mode:
5 standard USB ports- 0.5 A per port 2
2 USB fast charging ports - 1.2 A per port 2
***

This is not going to to be enough to keep more than two 4core Android device on fire (on the mentioned 1.2amp ports!). Of course, if you have old dual-core androids, this might be Ok... but I guess that's not going to be your purpose. Trust me Klik, you want to be going with something like this: Amazon.de -> B015HCLIZ6. Because this device offers 10x 2.4amp it have enough power to go with any common octo-core.
Sadly it does not offer USB-Data... so you'll need to work with wifi... which does quite well for me.
I ended up ordering this device: Amazon.UK -> B00MQZGOM0
The huge AC-DC converter does at the very most barely even get lukewarm, so this is to be recommended. (beware of the power plug edition according to your country)

Any under-powered USB-hub will likely either not going to have all your Androids run at 100% or the converter might get really hot and die soon. (avoid fire hazard, get "serious stuff")

As for your question about it being worth the invest... I'd say "yes". Because even if WCG at some point might not have any Android subproject going on (let's say, Zika and OET come to an end) there will still be other (whitelisted) projects from other Boinc-Projects to be crunched with/on Android. The real risk will be: How long will there be project support for the Android version that you will have installed... for now I would say, Android 4.4.2/.4 still works best. But devices now sell with 5.0/5.1 or 6.0, so if dev's at some point choose to switch to newer Android, you might end up dry.

So far, Android development has been TOO fast for dev's to port crunching to any new Android edition, but with dropping Android 4.2/4.4 sales, I expect this to change at some point. Only future will tell. Do not invest much into your Android devices, if they go "obsolete" the "investment damage" will be limited... (but anyway, still way more efficient than most common x64 units... and way, way cheaper... depending on what you buy and where you buy..... ah yes, and *if* you go with smartphones/tablets, make sure batteries are easily replaceable... batteries die after 1yr of 24/7 connection)
[Jun 1, 2016 8:58:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: OpenZika - Crunching Chart

/tot
[Jun 1, 2016 9:01:33 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 74   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread