| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Outsmart Ebola Together
Thread: Very Short Tasks |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 26
|
|
| Author |
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Seem to be getting a lot more points for these short WUs 02/04/2016 0:007:04:05:33 104,718 687 02/03/2016 0:007:04:37:39 32,647 112 02/02/2016 0:007:08:01:55 39,134 97 My last 3 days of stats. Runtime is about the same. But when these short WUs arrived, the quantity I completed went through the roof, which is fair enough, but I thought the points would be more-or-less the same. I thought the points calculation was related to the time you spend, not the quantity of WUs completed. I'm jealous! I normally see points from OET with these short runners plummet. |
||
|
|
[SG-FC]Hammerburg
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 251 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I´m getting more points for the short units but very different:
----------------------------------------02/04/2016 0:006:05:49:02 37,008 242 02/03/2016 0:005:05:49:59 44,430 191 02/02/2016 0:005:00:17:15 30,324 78 02/01/2016 0:006:10:02:39 38,863 97  |
||
|
|
BKraayev
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Mar 23, 2005 Post Count: 51 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
FW tasks are always short ... S tasks run longer, and F tasks run longer still
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Warped@RSA
Senior Cruncher South Africa Joined: Jan 15, 2006 Post Count: 440 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
FW tasks are always short ... S tasks run longer, and F tasks run longer still Thanks for that info. I have not taken the time to identify what distinguishes the different run lengths.
Dave
|
||
|
|
l_mckeon
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Post Count: 439 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
@ BKraayev
FW tasks are always short ... S tasks run longer, and F tasks run longer still Likewise, much appreciated. |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Seem to be getting a lot more points for these short WUs 02/04/2016 0:007:04:05:33 104,718 687 02/03/2016 0:007:04:37:39 32,647 112 02/02/2016 0:007:08:01:55 39,134 97 My last 3 days of stats. Runtime is about the same. But when these short WUs arrived, the quantity I completed went through the roof, which is fair enough, but I thought the points would be more-or-less the same. I thought the points calculation was related to the time you spend, not the quantity of WUs completed. I'm jealous! I normally see points from OET with these short runners plummet. How shortlived the joy and jealousy will have been... an appropriate piece of musique Symphony Pathetique for the occasion, and I don't mean the translation 'moving'  [OET pool average credit dropped to 18.11/hour, off by ~7 of what the other sciences are 'paying', around 25/hr: Symphony Pathetique |
||
|
|
hiimebm
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Oct 19, 2014 Post Count: 305 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Got a 17 minute task on a VM today. Gg.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Hit the buffering jackpot again [maxed out at 35 per core], not hard since the octo 3770K is only doing OET1. Batches 1840-1842 ran from 6 minutes to 22, and have a full 280 minus 8 running almost all of 1844. That's going to be a ranking Jump, as it has been doing the past few weeks... yesterday 3 places :-)))))
|
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Recently Active Project Badges:
|
By lucky chance I saw a WU some days ago that ran only 2 minutes and 48 seconds.
----------------------------------------This afternoon I had a WU - didn't notice it before - that ran for a whopping 69 seconds: 1456585448 ue 532.751682 ct 67.558680 fe 10167942503194 nm OET1_0001850_xSDGP-FW_rig_2840_0 et 69.916321 es 0 (from job_log_www.worldcommunitygrid.org.txt) ue=estimated time at start of WU et=elapsed time in Boinc Manager 1456585448=UNIX time of completion OET1_0001850_xSDGP-FW_rig_2840_0-- Valid 27/02/16 07:07:09 27/02/16 15:12:35 0.02 / 0.02 1.5 / 1.5 From the Result Status: [16:04:05] Finished task #0 cpu time used 66.860171 [Edit 2 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Feb 28, 2016 10:30:28 AM] |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Maybe the feeder and transitioner have a momentary 'keep up' problem...
----------------------------------------31523 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:30 PM [sched_op] CPU work request: 346990.27 seconds; 0.00 devices 31524 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:33 PM Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 31525 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:33 PM [sched_op] Server version 701 31526 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:33 PM No tasks sent 31527 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:33 PM No tasks are available for Outsmart Ebola Together 31528 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:33 PM This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress 31529 World Community Grid 2/27/2016 7:02:33 PM Project has no tasks available The device is definitely not at max per core "In Progress", all completed work reported. [Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Feb 27, 2016 6:07:49 PM] |
||
|
|
|