| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: Mapping Cancer Markers Forum
Thread: MCM - Linux Ubuntu & Win10 comparison |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 19
|
|
| Author |
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Now that at my home there are two almost identical intel boards (DG33FB & DP35DP) with two identical X3360 processors...a comparison of estimated time of WU is 20-30% slower on LINUX...why is that?
----------------------------------------to give numbers: - estimated run time on Ubuntu is 5h min +/- 5min - estimated run time on Win10 is 3h 50min min /- 5min why?! please tech & scientists respond ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by KLiK at Dec 14, 2015 6:31:51 PM] |
|||
|
||||
|
yoro42
Ace Cruncher United States Joined: Feb 19, 2011 Post Count: 8979 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Interesting question. I have no answer as to why but I wonder what the actual run times were if you have it.
----------------------------------------Thanks  |
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Interesting question. I have no answer as to why but I wonder what the actual run times were if you have it. Thanks the same name of the devices are written on device list...so you can check them out about MCM progress...  EDIT: DP35DP DG33FB techs, admins, scientists...what's wrong with this discrepancy in Linux & W10?!  ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by KLiK at Jan 15, 2016 7:19:22 AM] |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
KLik,
----------------------------------------Take screenshots because we cannot see your results (it just doesn't work that way)  - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
KLik, Take screenshots because we cannot see your results (it just doesn't work that way) DP35DP: https://www.dropbox.com/s/f39g66koc08qzxq/screen%20DP35DP.png?dl=0 DG33FB: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qzcwfedyq9w2979/screen%20DG33FB.png?dl=0 |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Interesting comparison.While I have no clue about the time discrepancy between Windows and Linux, I do see you are getting a number of errors on both. This project has been as stable as can be for me. If I see one error in a month it would be unusual. Do you have any idea why these may be occurring ? Just curious.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Interesting comparison.While I have no clue about the time discrepancy between Windows and Linux, I do see you are getting a number of errors on both. This project has been as stable as can be for me. If I see one error in a month it would be unusual. Do you have any idea why these may be occurring ? Just curious. Cheers doing some SETi@home BETA on GPUs, as no GPU are available in v8 of SETi@home...so some might get postponed until being too late...so all errors are in Aborted status with no CPU time on them! recently most of my rigs crunch in "high priority"...don't know why?! |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Interesting comparison.While I have no clue about the time discrepancy between Windows and Linux, I do see you are getting a number of errors on both. This project has been as stable as can be for me. If I see one error in a month it would be unusual. Do you have any idea why these may be occurring ? Just curious. Cheers doing some SETi@home BETA on GPUs, as no GPU are available in v8 of SETi@home...so some might get postponed until being too late...so all errors are in Aborted status with no CPU time on them! recently most of my rigs crunch in "high priority"...don't know why?! I see now. You might want to lower your cache just a bit to avoid the "Too Late" problem. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I see variations from 3 1/2 to 8 hours on two identical i7-3770 machines running Win7 64-bit. I would average your results for a longer time before reaching conclusions.
|
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Interesting comparison.While I have no clue about the time discrepancy between Windows and Linux, I do see you are getting a number of errors on both. This project has been as stable as can be for me. If I see one error in a month it would be unusual. Do you have any idea why these may be occurring ? Just curious. Cheers doing some SETi@home BETA on GPUs, as no GPU are available in v8 of SETi@home...so some might get postponed until being too late...so all errors are in Aborted status with no CPU time on them! recently most of my rigs crunch in "high priority"...don't know why?! I see now. You might want to lower your cache just a bit to avoid the "Too Late" problem. Cheers cache lowered...will see now! I see variations from 3 1/2 to 8 hours on two identical i7-3770 machines running Win7 64-bit. I would average your results for a longer time before reaching conclusions. well, this 2 machines are almost not used for 99% of their time...so only OS, with some programs & BOINC... so, that can be ruled out! ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by KLiK at Jan 17, 2016 9:07:41 PM] |
||
|
|
|