| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 6
|
|
| Author |
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Now that at my home there are two almost identical intel boards (DG33FB & DP35DP) with two identical X3360 processors...a comparison of estimated time of WU is 20-30% slower on LINUX...why is that?
----------------------------------------to give numbers: - estimated run time on Ubuntu is 3h 45min +/- 2min - estimated run time on Win10 is 2h 40min /- 2min why?! please tech & scientists respond |
||
|
|
ca05065
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 4, 2007 Post Count: 328 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
What do the BOINC benchmarks show?
|
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
You should run a few WU's first and then compare the results. Estimated is just that, estimated.
----------------------------------------![]() - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 1316 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Are you running 64-bit Linux, and if so is the UGM app 64-bit? i'm guessing that the Windows app is 32-bit only (I have no Windows machines on which to check!)
I have only done comparative testing on FAH2 jobs, but the average times for 32-bit FAH2 jobs on a 32-bit Linux virtual machine on a 64-bit Linux host are about 25% less than 64-bit FAH2 jobs run on the host itself. That makes the 64-bit apps about 30% slower. This observation is based on over 150 tasks of each type. It wouldn't surprise me if the same is true of quite a lot of applications - it will depend on compilation options (choice of arithmetic precision, &c), optimizations and all sorts of other things - 32-bit and 64-bit apps are rarely identical in performance. For what it's worth, the only platform I have that tends to get UGM jobs has an i3-2100 clocked at 3.1GHz, and it typically takes 3.5 to 4 hours to run a single 64-bit Linux UGM task. |
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
What do the BOINC benchmarks show? so, here are the results for the Linux Ubuntu:
& this is from Win10:
Are you running 64-bit Linux, and if so is the UGM app 64-bit? i'm guessing that the Windows app is 32-bit only (I have no Windows machines on which to check!) I have only done comparative testing on FAH2 jobs, but the average times for 32-bit FAH2 jobs on a 32-bit Linux virtual machine on a 64-bit Linux host are about 25% less than 64-bit FAH2 jobs run on the host itself. That makes the 64-bit apps about 30% slower. This observation is based on over 150 tasks of each type. It wouldn't surprise me if the same is true of quite a lot of applications - it will depend on compilation options (choice of arithmetic precision, &c), optimizations and all sorts of other things - 32-bit and 64-bit apps are rarely identical in performance. For what it's worth, the only platform I have that tends to get UGM jobs has an i3-2100 clocked at 3.1GHz, and it typically takes 3.5 to 4 hours to run a single 64-bit Linux UGM task. both OS are x64... but for science...have to let you know (when UGM arrives to crunch)! ![]() for now, only can tell that all UGM WUs are ver7.28! ![]() ---------------------------------------- [Edit 4 times, last edit by KLiK at Dec 15, 2015 8:58:56 AM] |
||
|
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I run only Win7 64-bit machines, and on an i5-3550 (3.3 GHz), I have been getting slightly under 2 hours per UGM WU (7.28). Note that that is on a full Ivy Bridge core however, so a virtual core would probably run about 3.5 hours or a little less as a guess.
----------------------------------------I will be putting together a Skylake machine later, with Linux Mint 18, so will be interested in seeing what works best on what OS. EDIT:To check the effect of hyperthreading, I ran UGM 7.28 on all 8 cores of an i7-4771 (3.7 GHz). They came in at exactly 3 hours, so this project does well on virtual cores. I think I will leave it on my Win7 64-bit machines. [Edit 3 times, last edit by Jim1348 at Apr 3, 2016 6:42:03 PM] |
||
|
|
|