| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Chat Room
Thread: I7 comparison |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 9
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
So I've been looking at the passmark intel scores comparing the I7 2600K to the I7 5820K.
----------------------------------------I7 2600K = 8568 I7 5820K = 12982 That's 50% more... I would have expected a LOT more than 50% since its a few generations later.... Hopefully it will do better in WCG. Esp with the 2400 mhz DDR4 RAM (compared to 1600 mhz)  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Jack007 at Feb 10, 2015 2:06:40 AM] |
||
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
That's just one benchmark and not always a reliable one. Did you try the benchmark within Boinc?
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
No not yet,
----------------------------------------Just picked it up today a day late, and I'm tired, will do Fri or Saturday I presume. Working for a living sux :D |
||
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
Putting together a new system is always exciting. Keep us posted about how it does.
----------------------------------------I'm getting 3601 and 12148 for whetstone and dhrystone, respectively, in the BOINC benchmark. i7-2600k @ 3.8Ghz constant (no turbo). Could be clocked higher but the power consumption is not worth it for 24/7 use in my opinion. |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Interesting,
----------------------------------------my I7 2600K at 4.2 ghz i think for 4017 whetstone, the I7 5820K at stock (3.3 I think, confirmed) for 3422 I have liquid in the 5820K (and the 2600K) so I'll maybe bump up to 3.6 after I check temps. Using 233 watts (on the UPS including monitor) 70 watts is GPU in idle.... should really make a ram disk, DDR4 at 2400MHZ, rather than burn up the SSD. |
||
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
Interesting, my I7 2600K at 4.2 ghz i think for 4017 whetstone, the I7 5820K at stock (3.3 I think, confirmed) for 3422 I have liquid in the 5820K (and the 2600K) so I'll maybe bump up to 3.6 after I check temps. Using 233 watts (on the UPS including monitor) 70 watts is GPU in idle.... should really make a ram disk, DDR4 at 2400MHZ, rather than burn up the SSD. That benchmark doesn't sound right either. I guess the real benchmark is is WCG when you look at device statistics for the work that both machines did on a given day. As for the ramdisk, can't you just elect not to use the "page file" space in boinc settings? That will force it to use the RAM I thought. Except when it comes to writing results to disk of course... |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My AMD A8-6500 at 3.5 GHZ has
----------------------------------------16-02-2015 18:46:28 | | 2789 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 16-02-2015 18:46:28 | | 9436 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU Only 88 watts for the whole PC :) I don't pay much attention to Intel, but I see many saying how Intel only gives a 5-10% increase of performance in every generation.  - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yes, but still ahead of Moore's Law.http://www.zdnet.com/article/computex-2014-in...he-next-era-in-computing/ and http://recode.net/2014/07/09/ibm-makes-3-billion-bet-on-life-after-moores-law/
|
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
without reading sekerob's links (I will later though!)
----------------------------------------I have to agree intel is pushing it. BUT, 3 gens or so after I7 2600, I expected more from the I7 5820k... Oh well it will make a great gamer, but i aint gonna lie. It's sitting there crunching i'm gaming on the 2600K til it dies!!! Perhaps it's because the die hasnt really shrank for the extreme processors... (I'll look now) 22nm process... so really i dont see any improvement... Edit: read above articles, it will be interesting to see what IBM comes up with. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Jack007 at Feb 17, 2015 3:27:27 PM] |
||
|
|
|