| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 36
|
|
| Author |
|
|
KWSN-A Shrubbery
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 476 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Managed to catch this run on lunch. I was promised punch and pie, or at least early next week.
----------------------------------------Glad to get beta as always, hopefully we're gonna see production soon. ![]() |
||
|
|
tmedve
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 191 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The time remaining on batch 322 behaves strangely. It fairly rapidly decreases to from the about 27 minutes down to 3 or 4 minutes at about 15% - 20% and then start climbing up slowly. Units are still checkpointing about every 10 minutes. Based on the percentages, these look like they may run for about 2 hours.
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by tmedve at Feb 6, 2015 10:02:06 PM] |
||
|
|
KWSN-A Shrubbery
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 476 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Couple units from batch 322 are showing no remaining time at 68%. CPU counter is still incrementing.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
BETA_ OET1_ 0000322_ xEBGP-FA_ rig_ 11014_ 0--
----------------------------------------This work unit has done nearly 23 minutes elapsed about the same CPU time, no checkpoint and 00:00% progress It's not the only one I'm seeing. Ubuntu 12.05 LTS server version with quad socket/processor
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've suspended and restarted a few units with LAIM off and one of those has turned Valid. Checkpoints occurred about every 6 minutes. However, the Result Log still shows the restarted CPU time as being 0. Is that intended?
Result Name: BETA_ OET1_ 0000319_ xSDGP-S_ rig_ 1684_ 0-- <core_client_version>7.2.47</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [20:27:08] Number of tasks = 1 [20:27:08] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000 [20:27:08] ./ZINC18056732_1.pdbqt size = 23 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta20.xSDGP-S_rig.pdbqt size = 2428 0 [21:15:25] Number of tasks = 1 [21:15:25] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000 [21:15:25] ./ZINC18056732_1.pdbqt size = 23 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta20.xSDGP-S_rig.pdbqt size = 2428 0 [21:21:39] Finished task #0 cpu time used 2785.663246 21:21:39 (137968): called boinc_finish(0) The checkpoint prior to suspend/restart: 06/02/2015 21:09:40 | World Community Grid | [checkpoint] result BETA_OET1_0000319_xSDGP-S_rig_1684_0 checkpointed Workunit Status: BETA_ OET1_ 0000319_ xSDGP-S_ rig_ 1684_ 1-- 719 Valid 06/02/15 20:27:17 06/02/15 21:24:07 0.68 20.2 / 23.6 BETA_ OET1_ 0000319_ xSDGP-S_ rig_ 1684_ 0-- 719 Valid 06/02/15 20:26:51 06/02/15 21:21:51 0.77 27.0 / 23.6 |
||
|
|
genhos
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2009 Post Count: 1108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
BETA_ OET1_ 0000322_ xEBGP-FA_ rig_ 11014_ 0-- This work unit has done nearly 23 minutes elapsed about the same CPU time, no checkpoint and 00:00% progress It's not the only one I'm seeing. Ubuntu 12.05 LTS server version with quad socket/processor My 322 unit (BETA_OET1_0000322_xEBGP-FA_rig_0488_0) has done it's first checkpoint after 40mins CPU but at least the % complete did keep increasing upto the checkpoint and is also continuing now. Win7 64bit with i7. Had a 318 unit and suspended with LAIM off and it restarted fine with regular checkpoints every few minutes. |
||
|
|
TPCBF
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 2, 2011 Post Count: 2173 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Got 50 WUs over all hosts so far, those that are already finished (1 valid, 7 PVa) range from 0.30h to 1.4h of runtime so far...
Ralf |
||
|
|
Yarensc
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 24, 2011 Post Count: 136 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
EDIT: Nevermind, remembered this is default BOINC behavior
----------------------------------------I had one from batch 322 that had not checkpointed yet at around 8 min CPU time. I suspended/resumed it with LAIM off and for some reason the progress % and CPU time didn't go back down to 0. The only other beta I have on this machine had already checkpointed, but it did correctly revert back to the last checkpoint. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Yarensc at Feb 7, 2015 2:01:42 AM] |
||
|
|
NorthernRaider
Cruncher Canada Joined: Dec 10, 2008 Post Count: 12 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Done Very Fast and Valid as you can see....
----------------------------------------Result Log Result Name: BETA_ OET1_ 0000320_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 1455_ 0-- <core_client_version>7.4.23</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [14:34:52] Number of tasks = 1 [14:34:52] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000 [14:34:52] ./ZINC13281671.pdbqt size = 16 1 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta20.xZAGP-FW_rig.pdbqt size = 2296 0 [14:38:52] Finished task #0 cpu time used 165.748000 14:38:52 (27149): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> 2nd One also Valid cpu time is Result Log Result Name: BETA_ OET1_ 0000322_ xEBGP-FA_ rig_ 9486_ 0-- <core_client_version>7.4.23</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [14:34:52] Number of tasks = 1 [14:34:52] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000 [14:34:52] ./ZINC24981830.pdbqt size = 20 6 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta20.xEBGP-FA_rig.pdbqt size = 2451 0 [15:53:29] Finished task #0 cpu time used 3278.844000 15:53:29 (27150): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> ================================== Completed these WU's and got 5 more WU's from 323 BETA_ OET1_ 0000323_ xEBGP-L_ rig_ 2551_ 0-- Jabbah Pending Validation 2/7/15 00:12:57 2/7/15 02:01:19 0.48 / 0.49 12.6 / 0.0 BETA_ OET1_ 0000322_ xEBGP-FA_ rig_ 9479_ 0-- Jabbah Valid 2/6/15 22:03:13 2/7/15 02:22:11 1.23 / 1.24 32.0 / 33.2 BETA_ OET1_ 0000322_ xEBGP-FA_ rig_ 9486_ 0-- Jabbah Valid 2/6/15 22:03:13 2/7/15 02:01:19 0.91 / 0.92 23.7 / 24.5 BETA_ OET1_ 0000320_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 1455_ 0-- Jabbah Valid 2/6/15 20:47:45 2/7/15 00:41:20 0.05 / 0.05 1.2 / 1 ![]() ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by DutchRaider at Feb 7, 2015 2:41:26 AM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Got several on both Windows and Linux. Suspend and resume are problem free. They start just where they left off. A very wide variety of times, from 6 minutes on a q6600 Windows to what looks like a couple hours on a Xeon 5405 on Linux. Even within the same batch of 322's on an AMD 9150e they vary from about 2 hours to what looks to be around 9 hours.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
|