Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 253
Posts: 253   Pages: 26   [ Previous Page | 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 46812 times and has 252 replies Next Thread
yoro42
Ace Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 19, 2011
Post Count: 8979
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ] Re: Android Beta

Four WU In Progress (Completion % shown):

22.9% - BETA_ OET1_ 0000065_ xSDGP_ 0094_ 0-- android_232dc43a In Progress 12/4/14 21:56:55 12/8/14 21:56:55 0.00 / 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
77.3% - BETA_ OET1_ 0000065_ xSDGP_ 0239_ 0-- android_232dc43a In Progress 12/4/14 21:51:17 12/8/14 21:51:17 0.00 / 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FINI (see below) 87.8% - BETA_ OET1_ 0000065_ xSDGP_ 0145_ 0-- android_232dc43a In Progress 12/4/14 19:47:39 12/8/14 19:47:39 0.00 / 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
68.5% - BETA_ OET1_ 0000065_ xSDGP_ 0130_ 0-- android_232dc43a In Progress 12/4/14 19:47:38 12/8/14 19:47:38 0.00 / 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

BETA_ OET1_ 0000065_ xSDGP_ 0145_ 0-- android_232dc43a Pending Validation 12/4/14 19:47:39 12/5/14 19:06:35 20.10 / 20.38 86.7 / 0.0
----------------------------------------

[Dec 5, 2014 8:53:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Yarensc
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Sep 24, 2011
Post Count: 136
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ] Re: Android Beta

I have one of the android units from batch 065 that errored out at around 70% (13 hours) on my HTC One running KitKat. It was checkpointing fine (between 5-30 minutes each) and everything was progressing smoothly (unlike the Windows betas) until the computational error hit.
I'm not positive, but it might have happened when it was force paused due to the battery level dropping too low (it was set to run on battery).

This task, along with two others that only ran for an hour, was listed as a 'segmentation violation' in the log, however this one added these lines the two short ones didn't have

#00 pc 0001f0bc <unknown> (???) [0xb43878]
#01 pc 00102688 /data/data/edu.berkeley.boinc/client/projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcgrid_beta20_v (_ZL21worker_signal_handleri+0x14) [0xebfbff91]
[Dec 6, 2014 12:35:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN-A Shrubbery
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 476
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

All my Android beta downloads get checksum or signature verification error. All the wingmen have similar errors.



KWSN, are you still seeing this with version 7.09 which ran against batch 65? Batch 69 had this issue which was running 7.08.

Thanks,
-Uplinger


Ok, so it turns out that this phone is still downloading the same errored tasks over and over and giving the same error. It's preventing me from downloading any tasks at all.

I reset the project. Guess we'll see if it makes a difference.

Edit: OK, able to download FAAH work so the reset appears to have worked.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by KWSN-A Shrubbery at Dec 6, 2014 2:10:50 AM]
[Dec 6, 2014 12:50:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Rob_B
Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Jun 2, 2007
Post Count: 22
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

I got one beta wu on one of my linux crunchers today and suspended it at around 45%. Now about an half hour after resuming the wu it is at 10% and it seems like it is stuck there.
I will let it run for a while and see what happens.

Computer:	i7-3770-linux
Project World Community Grid

Name BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_1301_2

Application Beta - Outsmart Ebola Together 7.07
Workunit name BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_1301
State Running High P.
Received 06/12/2014 08:35:19
Report deadline 07/12/2014 18:11:16
Estimated app speed 3.96 GFLOPs/sec
Estimated task size 7,367 GFLOPs
CPU time at last checkpoint 00:00:00
CPU time 01:34:15
Elapsed time 01:37:40
Estimated time remaining 14:39:04
Fraction done 10.000%
Virtual memory size 55.39 MB
Working set size 52.11 MB
Directory slots/8
Process ID 12349

----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Rob_B at Dec 6, 2014 9:16:11 AM]
[Dec 6, 2014 9:15:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

I got one beta wu on one of my linux crunchers today and suspended it at around 45%. Now about an half hour after resuming the wu it is at 10% and it seems like it is stuck there.
I will let it run for a while and see what happens.

Computer:	i7-3770-linux
Project World Community Grid

Name BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_1301_2

Application Beta - Outsmart Ebola Together 7.07
Workunit name BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_1301
State Running High P.
Received 06/12/2014 08:35:19
Report deadline 07/12/2014 18:11:16
Estimated app speed 3.96 GFLOPs/sec
Estimated task size 7,367 GFLOPs
CPU time at last checkpoint 00:00:00
CPU time 01:34:15
Elapsed time 01:37:40
Estimated time remaining 14:39:04
Fraction done 10.000%
Virtual memory size 55.39 MB
Working set size 52.11 MB
Directory slots/8
Process ID 12349

I have the same behavior on my Mac.
[Dec 6, 2014 9:38:51 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Rob_B
Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Jun 2, 2007
Post Count: 22
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

I see it isn't stuck anymore. But it makes 10% steps. And each step takes more than one hour.

This wu is a resend already.
The wu status shows one wingman as "no reply" and the other took over 15 hours to complete.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 6, 2014 11:40:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

These lengthy Beta v7.07 units should be worth attempting if you have a fast CPU, so that they have a better chance of finishing before a deadline is hit. Keith Uplinger has mentioned the value of doing this to help provide the techs with data about them.
[Dec 6, 2014 12:26:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1403
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

These lengthy Beta v7.07 units should be worth attempting if you have a fast CPU, so that they have a better chance of finishing before a deadline is hit. Keith Uplinger has mentioned the value of doing this to help provide the techs with data about them.

These tasks are almost worthless for the researchers.
The clients are not able to upload the results, because BOINC aborts the task.
It's not the deadline causing troubles, but the allowed maximum runtime.

Fast machines get less runtime for these tasks than slow machines,
so fast machines also suffer from the "Maximum elapsed time exceeded".

That maximum time is calculated in seconds from the division of 294697.70Gfpops/Gfpops_of_your_machine.

That 294697.70Gfpops came from the WCG-staff and was way to low for these heavy tasks.
[Dec 6, 2014 12:53:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

The clients are not able to upload the results, because BOINC aborts the task.
My point is that some (faster) clients do finish and upload results for some of these lengthy Beta v7.07 units, so it is worth attempting them on a faster machine. Yes, it's inefficient, but not worthless. Here's one recent example (mine was _5):

BETA_ OET1_ 0000307_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 0323_ 5-- 707 Valid 05/12/14 17:43:39 06/12/14 11:47:37 17.89 17.1 / 17.1
BETA_ OET1_ 0000307_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 0323_ 4-- - No Reply 04/12/14 17:35:01 06/12/14 03:11:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ OET1_ 0000307_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 0323_ 3-- 707 Valid 04/12/14 08:07:37 05/12/14 19:27:25 23.59 17.1 / 17.1
BETA_ OET1_ 0000307_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 0323_ 2-- 707 Error 02/12/14 17:34:26 04/12/14 16:20:36 32.69 17.1 / 0.0
BETA_ OET1_ 0000307_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 0323_ 1-- 707 User Aborted 02/12/14 07:37:52 02/12/14 17:34:22 0.09 3.1 / 0.0
BETA_ OET1_ 0000307_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 0323_ 0-- 707 Error 02/12/14 07:37:25 04/12/14 08:05:09 22.60 17.1 / 0.0

[Dec 6, 2014 1:15:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]


These tasks are almost worthless for the researchers.
The clients are not able to upload the results, because BOINC aborts the task.
It's not the deadline causing troubles, but the allowed maximum runtime.

Fast machines get less runtime for these tasks than slow machines,
so fast machines also suffer from the "Maximum elapsed time exceeded".

That maximum time is calculated in seconds from the division of 294697.70Gfpops/Gfpops_of_your_machine.

That 294697.70Gfpops came from the WCG-staff and was way to low for these heavy tasks.

Agree. I have fast machines but have been aborting any tasks that have been sent out more than 3 times after checking my results and finding none that validate. How many times do the techs need to see the same error? Complete waste of computing time IMHO.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Dec 6, 2014 1:18:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 253   Pages: 26   [ Previous Page | 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread