Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 234
Posts: 234   Pages: 24   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 32322 times and has 233 replies Next Thread
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7777
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

OK, they seemed to have fixed the problem with these units being sized too big, but they have not fixed the credit issue with them. I had 5 of them complete in 8 to about 13 hours. The two shorter ones actually got credited with what I think is the proper amount of points (500+), but the three longer ones all exceeded the "maximum point level" and got 64.7 points. The maximum point level must be set too low for the longer running units. Once they exceed this level they are penalized for potential cheating. This is on a stock Xeon e5410 with Linux Mint 16. Once again I don't care that much about the points, but I do care about the accuracy of the system. Perhaps the techs could raise the maximum allowed as some of these units would require. I am pretty sure I am not the only affected by this.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Sep 17, 2014 12:11:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
katoda
Senior Cruncher
Poland
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 172
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

Indeed Joe, I'm affected by those lengthy units and I'm strongly considering cancelling them right after they come to my PC. Receiving funny 64 points after 24 or 26 hours of calculations looks like mockery to me.
----------------------------------------

[Sep 17, 2014 12:32:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Post Count: 392
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

The work units that are currently being sent out were built before the sizing was fixed. Since the problem only affected some work units, many will be normal sized, but others will still be large. We're working on getting an estimate for when we'll get to ones built with sizing fix.

Seippel
[Sep 17, 2014 3:58:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
branjo
Master Cruncher
Slovakia
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
Post Count: 1892
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

I have a feeling I got another one. Almost 11 h run time, 18,8% done (my record is 102 hours CPU time i.e. 106.5 h run time returned 3 days after the deadline, still PVal) - FAHV_ x3VQE_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0224786_ 0057_ 3--

Well, will keep charging my Smartphone whole days whistling
----------------------------------------

Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006

[Sep 17, 2014 5:00:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Werinbert
Advanced Cruncher
United States
Joined: Jun 13, 2013
Post Count: 56
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

As to the credits of these long WUs. My 245 hour WU claimed 64.8 which is the default anti cheating value. My wingman claimed 227.7 for almost 50 hours of work. The result is we both got 146.2 credits for the WU. So this anti cheating credit amount is affecting everyone. It suggest WCG create a script to look for these underscoring long WUs and fix the allocated credit for them.
----------------------------------------

[Sep 17, 2014 10:01:33 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jonnieb-uk
Ace Cruncher
England
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
Post Count: 6105
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

The work units that are currently being sent out were built before the sizing was fixed. Since the problem only affected some work units, many will be normal sized, but others will still be large. We're working on getting an estimate for when we'll get to ones built with sizing fix.

Seippel

Nice to know we may get an estimate how long this problem will persist.

It would have been better if the question of 64.7 points awarded irrespective of runtime had been addressed. If users begin to abort FAHV WUs on sight, as has been suggested in previous comments, it will take considerably longer to clear the backlog of pre-fix WUs.
----------------------------------------

To Join follow this link: Join the UK Team All Welcome! UK Team thread
[Sep 17, 2014 10:23:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

Just sent this back after 7:45 hours at 6.000 percent, with code 203, user abort.

7.16 fahv FAHV_x3VQA_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0222584_0008_10 07:45:12 (07:13:36) 93.21 6.000 00:26:14 03d,04:14:23 9/18/2014 3:55:31 AM [0] 00:08:18 Running

Copy _10, i.e. the 11th. 7.75 / 0.06 = 129.66 hours, never going to make the deadline, if it would not crash with signal 11 before that. Copy _11 and a 'too late' conversion pre-programmed to happen.

For signal 11 on android, think now that it's something coming away from the gui manager doing it's communications and interfering with the tasks or client_state. The jargon something like race condition? Been running the past 48 hours without the gui loaded, using the disconnect option and none happened since. Only occasionally reconnected to have a quick peek, and then discovering one of these long x3vq's running headlessly into that 3.5 days deadline wall. sad
[Sep 18, 2014 9:55:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

Btw, just discovered 4 more in the queue of these. Code 203. Please let us know when it's 'save' to let these run.
[Sep 18, 2014 9:59:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

Still a few floating around..
FAHV_ x3VQD_ IN_ LEDGFa_ rig_ 0223664_ 0025_ 0-- 720 Pending Validation 9/15/14 10:50:01 9/19/14 00:28:37 65.87 227.5 / 0.0

Seesh 65 hours for 227.5 points. Seems like a waste of Hydro running these. I have 3 more of the same still running with 42 hours for 53%. Think i should abort these.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 19, 2014 2:18:07 AM]
[Sep 19, 2014 12:32:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dennis-TW
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 28, 2010
Post Count: 13
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Have very slow WU # FAHV_x3VQ7_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0220728_0005

Here too...

FAHV_ x3VQD_ IN_ LEDGFa_ rig_ 0223529_ 0018_ 0-- Valid 15.09.14 01:40:16 18.09.14 21:25:34 46.96 / 48.59 227.5 / 227.5

FAHV_ x3VQD_ IN_ LEDGFa_ rig_ 0223479_ 0056_ 1-- Pending Validation 15.09.14 00:43:21 18.09.14 20:20:25 47.23 / 48.87 227.5 / 0.0
[Sep 19, 2014 3:50:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 234   Pages: 24   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread