Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 234
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7777 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, they seemed to have fixed the problem with these units being sized too big, but they have not fixed the credit issue with them. I had 5 of them complete in 8 to about 13 hours. The two shorter ones actually got credited with what I think is the proper amount of points (500+), but the three longer ones all exceeded the "maximum point level" and got 64.7 points. The maximum point level must be set too low for the longer running units. Once they exceed this level they are penalized for potential cheating. This is on a stock Xeon e5410 with Linux Mint 16. Once again I don't care that much about the points, but I do care about the accuracy of the system. Perhaps the techs could raise the maximum allowed as some of these units would require. I am pretty sure I am not the only affected by this.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
katoda
Senior Cruncher Poland Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 172 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Indeed Joe, I'm affected by those lengthy units and I'm strongly considering cancelling them right after they come to my PC. Receiving funny 64 points after 24 or 26 hours of calculations looks like mockery to me.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The work units that are currently being sent out were built before the sizing was fixed. Since the problem only affected some work units, many will be normal sized, but others will still be large. We're working on getting an estimate for when we'll get to ones built with sizing fix.
Seippel |
||
|
branjo
Master Cruncher Slovakia Joined: Jun 29, 2012 Post Count: 1892 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a feeling I got another one. Almost 11 h run time, 18,8% done (my record is 102 hours CPU time i.e. 106.5 h run time returned 3 days after the deadline, still PVal) - FAHV_ x3VQE_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0224786_ 0057_ 3--
----------------------------------------Well, will keep charging my Smartphone whole days ![]() ![]() Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006 ![]() |
||
|
Werinbert
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Jun 13, 2013 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As to the credits of these long WUs. My 245 hour WU claimed 64.8 which is the default anti cheating value. My wingman claimed 227.7 for almost 50 hours of work. The result is we both got 146.2 credits for the WU. So this anti cheating credit amount is affecting everyone. It suggest WCG create a script to look for these underscoring long WUs and fix the allocated credit for them.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
jonnieb-uk
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Nov 30, 2011 Post Count: 6105 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The work units that are currently being sent out were built before the sizing was fixed. Since the problem only affected some work units, many will be normal sized, but others will still be large. We're working on getting an estimate for when we'll get to ones built with sizing fix. Seippel Nice to know we may get an estimate how long this problem will persist. It would have been better if the question of 64.7 points awarded irrespective of runtime had been addressed. If users begin to abort FAHV WUs on sight, as has been suggested in previous comments, it will take considerably longer to clear the backlog of pre-fix WUs. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Just sent this back after 7:45 hours at 6.000 percent, with code 203, user abort.
7.16 fahv FAHV_x3VQA_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0222584_0008_10 07:45:12 (07:13:36) 93.21 6.000 00:26:14 03d,04:14:23 9/18/2014 3:55:31 AM [0] 00:08:18 Running Copy _10, i.e. the 11th. 7.75 / 0.06 = 129.66 hours, never going to make the deadline, if it would not crash with signal 11 before that. Copy _11 and a 'too late' conversion pre-programmed to happen. For signal 11 on android, think now that it's something coming away from the gui manager doing it's communications and interfering with the tasks or client_state. The jargon something like race condition? Been running the past 48 hours without the gui loaded, using the disconnect option and none happened since. Only occasionally reconnected to have a quick peek, and then discovering one of these long x3vq's running headlessly into that 3.5 days deadline wall. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Btw, just discovered 4 more in the queue of these. Code 203. Please let us know when it's 'save' to let these run.
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Still a few floating around..
----------------------------------------FAHV_ x3VQD_ IN_ LEDGFa_ rig_ 0223664_ 0025_ 0-- 720 Pending Validation 9/15/14 10:50:01 9/19/14 00:28:37 65.87 227.5 / 0.0 Seesh 65 hours for 227.5 points. Seems like a waste of Hydro running these. I have 3 more of the same still running with 42 hours for 53%. Think i should abort these. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 19, 2014 2:18:07 AM] |
||
|
Dennis-TW
Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2010 Post Count: 13 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here too...
FAHV_ x3VQD_ IN_ LEDGFa_ rig_ 0223529_ 0018_ 0-- Valid 15.09.14 01:40:16 18.09.14 21:25:34 46.96 / 48.59 227.5 / 227.5 FAHV_ x3VQD_ IN_ LEDGFa_ rig_ 0223479_ 0056_ 1-- Pending Validation 15.09.14 00:43:21 18.09.14 20:20:25 47.23 / 48.87 227.5 / 0.0 |
||
|
|
![]() |