| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 BETA test new workunits - Aug 15, 2014 [ Issues Thread ] |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 118
|
|
| Author |
|
|
darth_vader
Veteran Cruncher A galaxy far, far away... Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Post Count: 514 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
The lone WU I received this go-round isn't looking too good:
BETA_ E225108_ 198_ S.328.C46H29N1O2.QUXRBYOXBHTSAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N.5_ s1_ 14_ 3-- 640 Error 8/25/14 14:48:52 8/26/14 03:23:32 8.93 254.3 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 198_ S.328.C46H29N1O2.QUXRBYOXBHTSAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N.5_ s1_ 14_ 4-- 640 Error 8/25/14 14:48:52 8/26/14 15:28:50 9.02 336.9 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 198_ S.328.C46H29N1O2.QUXRBYOXBHTSAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N.5_ s1_ 14_ 2-- 640 Error 8/22/14 17:43:02 8/23/14 12:19:19 12.59 352.4 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 198_ S.328.C46H29N1O2.QUXRBYOXBHTSAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N.5_ s1_ 14_ 1-- 640 Error 8/18/14 17:54:07 8/19/14 20:19:58 11.18 342.1 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 198_ S.328.C46H29N1O2.QUXRBYOXBHTSAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N.5_ s1_ 14_ 0-- 640 Error 8/18/14 17:43:01 8/23/14 15:30:00 8.68 218.5 / 0.0 There are two more  - D |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
darth_vader, what does the Result Log show for one or more of those errored results? All the CPU times are quite long. You may have an example of one of the large non-convergent cases. I think it's useful to the researchers to know even that outcome.
|
||
|
|
darth_vader
Veteran Cruncher A galaxy far, far away... Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Post Count: 514 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Result Log
Result Name: BETA_ E225108_ 198_ S.328.C46H29N1O2.QUXRBYOXBHTSAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N.5_ s1_ 14_ 3-- <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [11:02:38] Number of jobs = 8 [11:02:38] Starting job 0,CPU time has been restored to 0.000000. [13:57:51] Finished Job #0 [13:57:51] Starting job 1,CPU time has been restored to 10406.717509. [14:04:11] Number of jobs = 8 [14:04:11] Starting job 1,CPU time has been restored to 10406.717509. [16:33:03] Finished Job #1 [16:33:03] Starting job 2,CPU time has been restored to 19269.181119. [16:45:21] Number of jobs = 8 [16:45:21] Starting job 2,CPU time has been restored to 19269.181119. [17:00:30] Finished Job #2 [17:00:30] Starting job 3,CPU time has been restored to 20153.067185. [17:16:56] Finished Job #3 [17:16:56] Starting job 4,CPU time has been restored to 21133.283868. [17:31:39] Finished Job #4 [17:31:39] Starting job 5,CPU time has been restored to 22011.850300. [17:45:16] Finished Job #5 [17:45:16] Starting job 6,CPU time has been restored to 22824.880712. Application exited with RC = 0x1 [20:21:03] Finished Job #6 [20:21:03] Starting job 7,CPU time has been restored to 32137.875210. [20:21:03] Skipping Job #7 20:21:09 (6504): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
That's odd, I wouldn't have expected an exit with RC = 0x1 to result in Error. Finishing in Job #6 is common (I haven't seen any progress to Job #7). The WU restarted a couple of times (at 14:04:11 and 16:45:21) but that shouldn't cause an Error either. So I don't think there's anything different you could have done to prevent the Error result.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've just checked and have seen some like that. But I, too, don't know why they've been declared as errors. The only thing I noticed is that there have been different client code levels, but I sure hope that's not something that's causing a bad compare. I just assume that the validator looks at some data that we can't (easily) see.
|
||
|
|
branjo
Master Cruncher Slovakia Joined: Jun 29, 2012 Post Count: 1892 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I would recommend updating your BOINC to version 7.
----------------------------------------Cheers   Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006  |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
Just picked up a _9 resend. Is it wrong to be wildly optimistic about this one?
----------------------------------------Is this a rhetorical question? Inquiring minds want to know.  Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Just picked up a _9 resend. Is it wrong to be wildly optimistic about this one? Wishing you the best of luck in completing it here is hoping for success. Let us know how it goes  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Just picked up a _9 resend. Is it wrong to be wildly optimistic about this one? Maybe, maybe not Is this a rhetorical question?  . I've just completed this _7 resend:BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 7-- 640 Pending Validation 27/08/14 22:41:30 28/08/14 06:26:49 7.45 248.7 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 6-- - In Progress 27/08/14 22:41:28 31/08/14 22:41:28 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 4-- 640 Error 25/08/14 14:55:51 26/08/14 00:10:25 7.78 274.0 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 5-- 640 Error 25/08/14 14:55:50 27/08/14 22:41:23 15.27 402.8 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 2-- 640 Error 20/08/14 08:11:22 21/08/14 06:45:46 10.50 272.3 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 3-- 640 Error 20/08/14 08:11:21 20/08/14 18:51:49 5.85 163.8 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 1-- 640 Error 18/08/14 17:59:26 19/08/14 13:36:29 14.28 324.1 / 0.0 BETA_ E225108_ 942_ S.328.C43H31N1S2.QXKUWPGSVZUAMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 0-- 640 Error 18/08/14 17:50:33 20/08/14 08:11:12 6.29 158.8 / 0.0 Every one of those Result Logs has RC=0x1 in Job#6 with no abnormalities, not even a restart anywhere. Maybe the Validator has been tweaked between 27/08/14 22:41:23 and 28/08/14 06:26:49 (GMT)? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I would recommend updating your BOINC to version 7. Just to waste users' time? Or do you have a real reason to suggest this? |
||
|
|
|