| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: CEP2 validator disabled - Resolved/Resumed |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 89
|
|
| Author |
|
|
AgrFan
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 17, 2008 Post Count: 397 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
deleted
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by AgrFan at Sep 6, 2014 12:16:23 AM] |
||
|
|
pcwr
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Sep 17, 2005 Post Count: 10903 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
As there seem to be no CEP2 WUs for now (got 4 at the end of last week), I have gone back to MCM.
----------------------------------------Patrick  |
||
|
|
HopeSoloFan
Cruncher Joined: Jul 17, 2011 Post Count: 4 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
High folks, nice to talk to you!
I've got a curious (although not the biggest of them all) problem with my latest CEP2-Task: E225110_ 262_ S.330.C43H28N4O2.QKMVAZDRTWOYIO-UHFFFAOYSA-N.4_ s1_ 14_ 4-- I got it yesterday, started it today and it was finished this evening (Germany) and uploaded. So far so good. Now there's a problem, to my surprise it is now stated as "too late". As I remember, the deadline was Thu, Sep 4. I even have a backup of the BOINC-data-folder, where the Unix-Timestamp of this task in the client_state.xml-File shows 1409816568.000000, which also means Thu, Sep 4. Now, is there any explanation, why this task is stated as "too late"? Thanks for your answer(s) in advance! |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7849 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I believe this is the default designation when the techs are still working out the problems. Although I would have thought they would have just done a server abort. At any rate, none of that is your fault, just something the techs did.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
vepaul
Senior Cruncher Belgium Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 261 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
E225116_ 515_ S.336.C46H30N2S1.QWQJRIBAXJLDTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N.7_ s1_ 14_ 4-- - En cours 2/09/14 01:04:56 5/09/14 13:04:56 0,00 0,0 / 0,0
E225116_ 515_ S.336.C46H30N2S1.QWQJRIBAXJLDTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N.7_ s1_ 14_ 3-- 640 Erreur 1/09/14 13:52:27 2/09/14 01:04:47 8,30 350,1 / 0,0 E225116_ 515_ S.336.C46H30N2S1.QWQJRIBAXJLDTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N.7_ s1_ 14_ 2-- 640 Erreur 31/08/14 16:38:35 1/09/14 13:52:16 11,19 444,1 / 0,0 E225116_ 515_ S.336.C46H30N2S1.QWQJRIBAXJLDTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N.7_ s1_ 14_ 1-- 640 Erreur 30/08/14 04:10:23 31/08/14 03:54:21 8,89 320,2 / 0,0 E225116_ 515_ S.336.C46H30N2S1.QWQJRIBAXJLDTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N.7_ s1_ 14_ 0-- 640 Non concluant 30/08/14 04:06:00 31/08/14 16:38:23 13,01 454,4 / 0,0 Still many errors ... running on HP Pavilion9, Windows 7 VEP |
|||
|
||||
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Think the 4 percent error is enough to pretty permanently render all participating devices as not reliable, meaning always wingman required. That is, if the 20 plus sequential valids rule still stands after which a host is allowed to do it alone. Derived from that extrapolation, you may want to put an end to the zero redundant and default distribute 2 copies. Not run the statistics, but you might get a slightly faster average validation on results. You have the data to determine a yes or no. Good point. They might be able to deal with that by just not counting as an error the results where the application exits with RC = 0x1 after Job #6; maybe there are other ways. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Seems there's still some problems... only 5,364 results returned at the latest stats update.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 4, 2014 3:30:25 PM] |
||
|
|
jonnieb-uk
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Nov 30, 2011 Post Count: 6105 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Seems there's still some problems... only 5,364 results returned at the latest stats update. Although there's been no official announcement either a). Iit's likely that all machines doing CEP2 work are having to reprove themselves as "reliable" or b). Zero quorum has been disabled until they're sure they've resolved the problem Either way, I suspect CEP2 P/Vals are higher than normal and Results corresponding lower for a day or two. Anyone seen any zero quorum WUs? |
||
|
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Anyone seen any zero quorum WUs? I have one machine that was zero quorum for the past 24 hours. However, it picked up a couple of errors this morning, and I am not sure how long it will be before it returns to zero. (My three other PCs still are not at zero, but they have not completed as many work units yet.) |
||
|
|
jonnieb-uk
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Nov 30, 2011 Post Count: 6105 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Tks Jim.
---------------------------------------- Good to know that zero quorum work is still possible. I guess most people and still trying to attain "reliable status.Back in August lavaflow posted Trusted' or 'reliable' is at science app level and is maintained by always having the last 20+ serially rated with valid. This includes results from before a problem occurred that had been waiting on a wingman. |
||
|
|
|