Hi all.

Sorry for the lack of responses, I was away in the UK for a conference and so my time zones were very messed up (jet lag... :( ) . WRT the validator, we have identified a problem for which calculations could be marked as invalid, when they are in fact valid. This stems from the fact that the first job is a different type (optimisation vs single point) than in the previous library.

We think we have got it sorted, but are just being extra careful. I will contact the IBM guys today to get a progress report, but hopefully we should be up and running very soon.

Your Harvard CEP Team

We have gone through a few iterations of the CEP2 validator due to the most recent work units sent to us from the researchers. We would like to thank the members for their patience while we worked closely with the researchers at Harvard to resolve the issues. Please note that some work units may still show up as validate error, and these are due to work units not converging and are known to happen on the larger molecule work units. With the changes to the validator against the hardest work units, the validate errors are below 4%. We will be running the validator against results that had validate error before and should see these clear. Once validation is caught up we will begin indexing new work and sending out more work for CEP2.

Thank you for your patience,
-Uplinger

I have just gained an extra 3 days credit without having run anything for 2 weeks, so we must be getting back to normal soon.

Thanks, guys.

Mike

I didn't get any CP2 WUs for the last few days.
The ones before ended all in error (15 to 25 August).
Can I expect some in the coming days?

VEP

I have been resumed sending out new work units for cep2. These first few batches getting sent will be more difficult. With the new validation rules in place we will have a decrease in validation errors as well as results being incorrectly marked as invalid.

Thanks,
-Uplinger