Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 12
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 99193 times and has 11 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Better tools for AIDS drug research / Scripps team publishes a paper

mgl1=fa@h lead scientist Professor Arthur J. Olsen according one of the signed mgl1 posts.

Still trying to understand the envisioned mechanics. Is bedam going to run as a replacement or a bolt-on to autodock/ad vina? Docking is needed to find the best poses through the scoring system, then the top poses are passed onto bedam, which are expensive in computational time, speak heavy or long were they running on a random machine on the volunteer grid. Is it that these poses can somehow be sliced in pieces and than each computed on a non-homogeneous grid, then when all done a picture fitted together? Or, is there some minimum scoring set, like the best energy, and when minimum met, a switch flipped to call on the bedam routine?
[Aug 2, 2014 8:50:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Better tools for AIDS drug research / Scripps team publishes a paper

Hello lavaflow,

Currently planned, we at MGL would send a top proportion of small molecules for a given protein structure to the Levy Lab. The Levy Lab would then create a "complex structure," one ligand pose and its corresponding protein structure, for each ligand, and prepare/submit a BEDAM job to WCG.

The BEDAM job is a free energy simulation that does not rely on grids but the atoms of the complex structure. Most probably 1 BEDAM job, like an AutoDock job, will be split into several work units. Once the BEDAM jobs are complete for a group of top poses for a given protein, the poses would be re-ranked according to the calculated free energies.

For a quick example, imagine that we give them the top 100 ligands for a given protein, and we only had enough money to test 10 compounds. Suppose that we somehow knew that there were only 10 hits (compounds able to affect the protein's activity and may be worthy of further investigation), and all of them were ranked in the top 100 ; however, say the compounds were ranked 10th, 20th, 30th, ..., 100th. If we tested the top 10 ligands at this point, we would only find 1 hit. From what we observed in the SAMPL Challenge, BEDAM has the capability to calculate free energies so that the new rankings would yield at least 5 ligands, instead of 1 ligand, within the top 10. In other words, BEDAM has been observed to enrich Vina dockings by a factor of 5 (I believe it's actually 4.8 reported in our publication).

Hopefully, I've touched on the mechanics or workflow that you wanted me to discuss. Soon, the Levy Lab will have their own website and section of the forum, but until then let me know if there are any more questions.

Thanks,

Dan
[Aug 5, 2014 3:27:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread