| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 12
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Is anyone else seeing a higher than normal points granted for for the FAHV Vina units ? I am starting to see the longer units running 3 to 4 hours on a Xeon E5410 running Linux Mint. I have traditionally seen about 30 to 35 points per hour, but am now seeing over 70 points per hour. The Autodock units remain about 20 points per hour. There has been no change in the machine or OS for a long time. I am not complaining, bit it just seems strange.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My FAHV work units seem to be running incredibly long, I don't know if this is the same issue. I remember that my computer can normally clear a Vina WU in about 2-3 hours and its now taking upwards of 12h+. Hopefully the points will reflect this increase in compute time (Whats weird is that the WU requires the normal amount of Gflops a vina WU would normally need). This is bizarre.
----------------------------------------[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 23, 2014 4:42:01 PM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
If your VINA WU's were running 2 to 3 hours and now need 12+ hours that is about 4+times as long. That is about the same ratio I am seeing. Old Chap had mentioned in another thread he was seeing longer VINA WU's also. Let us know how they turn out.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Jun 5, 2009 Post Count: 978 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well Joe, Here 28pph >> 43 pph is typical for most but the very long ones (14 hours) have been as low as 5.6 pph
----------------------------------------The problem is I cannot give you a conclusive answer really as each rig is behaving differently with those long ones. In general though yes as today was my high score.... but after a couple of low days http://boincstats.com/en/stats/15/user/detail/596475/lastDays http://stats.free-dc.org/stats.php?page=user&proj=bwcg&name=596475 Showing this with >95% FAHV remainder being FAAH edit The variance between wu's is shown below: ![]() 2 groups of 4 similar runtimes. The second group is the faster machine ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by OldChap at Feb 23, 2014 10:08:45 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Its weird. I used to be able to finish Vina WU in 2-3h. Now my VINA WU are racking up 18h of elapsed time and 9h of cpu time (only at about 85%). This huge lapse between elapsed time and cpu time is very bizarre. I will keep you updated on the numbers when the WU finishes.
----------------------------------------EDIT - It appears Autodock WU run normally (normal time frame). Whats interesting is that the Autodock WUs have a larger Gflops then the VINA ones. Something is definitely up. [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 24, 2014 12:45:35 AM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Here is a sample of today's work.
----------------------------------------FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 3.06 / 3.06 222.7 / 222.7 72.2 PPH FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 3.51 / 3.57 259.8 / 259.8 74.0 PPH FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 2.98 / 3.02 219.7 / 219.7 73.7 PPH FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 3.41 / 3.41 248.2 / 248.2 72.78 PPH FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 3.37 / 3.42 249.2 / 249.2 73.9 PPH FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 2.72 / 2.73 198.6 / 198.6 73.0 PPH FAHV_ -- PowerEdge-1950 Valid 2/21/14 02:10:22 2/23/14 13:15:04 2.66 / 2.68 195.3 / 195.3 73.0 PPH I do not understand why my credits have become so good. I am not complaining, but it is baffling. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I picked one at random and wow, there were quite a number of user aborts. Also looks like my credits are back down to a sane level.
----------------------------------------Result Name App Ver Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time / Elaps Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 6-- 706 Valid 2/22/14 09:02:59 2/23/14 01:18:51 2.37 53.4 / 44.2 FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 5-- 706 User Aborted 2/22/14 08:51:43 2/22/14 09:01:43 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 4-- 706 User Aborted 2/22/14 08:41:31 2/22/14 08:51:27 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 3-- 706 User Aborted 2/22/14 08:31:09 2/22/14 08:41:09 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 2-- 706 Valid 2/22/14 08:20:59 2/24/14 17:21:29 1.75 35.0 / 44.2 FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 1-- 706 User Aborted 2/22/14 08:20:45 2/22/14 08:30:48 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x3NF7_ A_ IN_ LEDGFb_ rig_ 0198460_ 1222_ 0-- 706 User Aborted 2/22/14 08:10:16 2/22/14 08:20:23 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 Edit: I found another one of note, this is kind of ridiculous faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 9-- 715 Valid 2/21/14 09:42:13 2/21/14 23:52:15 2.99 56.4 / 56.1 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 8-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 09:32:09 2/21/14 09:41:55 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 7-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 09:21:52 2/21/14 09:31:56 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 6-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 09:11:55 2/21/14 09:21:34 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 5-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 09:01:20 2/21/14 09:11:43 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 4-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 08:50:58 2/21/14 09:01:04 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 3-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 08:41:01 2/21/14 08:50:44 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 2-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 08:30:52 2/21/14 08:40:54 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 1-- 715 Valid 2/21/14 08:20:50 2/24/14 14:04:58 2.78 55.7 / 56.1 < Mine faah392066_ ZINC08189648_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 0-- 715 User Aborted 2/21/14 08:20:32 2/21/14 08:30:30 0.00 75.8 / 0.0 Cheers
Sgt. Joe
----------------------------------------*Minnesota Crunchers* [Edit 3 times, last edit by Sgt.Joe at Feb 24, 2014 10:29:38 PM] |
||
|
|
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Jun 5, 2009 Post Count: 978 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Every picture tells a story
----------------------------------------2 days now of pure FAHV http://stats.free-dc.org/stats.php?page=user&proj=bwcg&name=596475 ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
To report back to you, those VINA WUs that took long granted very large sums of points.
|
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Every picture tells a story 2 days now of pure FAHV http://stats.free-dc.org/stats.php?page=user&proj=bwcg&name=596475 I can see why you would abort the autodock units, because the Vina units run so much better in Linux, but why would people be aborting the Vina units ? Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
|