Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1574 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7844
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Odd result

Strange point result.
faah382903_ ZINC14077323_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 1-- 715 Valid 12/13/13 09:02:13 12/14/13 10:32:51 12.94 10.8 / 10.8
faah382903_ ZINC14077323_ x4GVMaINleA_ 00_ 0-- 715 Valid 12/12/13 03:53:56 12/13/13 08:31:12 3.89 71.0 / 10.8
Must be the gremlins in the server again. laughing

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Dec 14, 2013 1:34:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Odd result

Yes, the one Monsanto crossed with a Leprechaun. wink

Had a CEP2 of 12 hours that got the grand credit of 5.7 per hour [Off a 4770], and that was 50% more than 'claimed', where the server computes the claim from device throughput statistics

E217323_ 722_ J.46.C38H19N3O2S3.00089142.2.set1d06_ 2-- Valid 14-12-2013 10:07:00 12-12-2013 6:59:47 12,00 47,8 68,8 41,43 5,73 CEP2 10-12-2013 13:34:15 12,11

The random walk generator continues to baffle... maybe a project can be forked from MCM that can get the performance imprint of all devices... Mapping Credit Markers. Estimated completion 2016 laughing

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Dec 14, 2013 1:50:59 PM]
[Dec 14, 2013 1:50:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7844
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Odd result

Here is another odd thing.

MCM1_ 0000603_ 9818_ 2-- 726 Valid 12/14/13 13:32:06 12/15/13 00:18:10 5.40 122.2 / 132.0
MCM1_ 0000603_ 9818_ 0-- 726 Server Aborted 12/14/13 13:22:00 12/15/13 01:42:31 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
MCM1_ 0000603_ 9818_ 1-- 726 Valid 12/14/13 13:21:59 12/14/13 18:15:02 4.85 141.8 / 132.0
If this is supposed to be a "Quorum 2" and "Replication 2" why was a third WU sent out 10 minutes after the first two WU were sent out ?

"Curiouser and curiouser" - Alice Through the Looking Glass
Cheers

Edit: Yes I know it is a MCM1 unit and this is the FAAH area.
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sgt.Joe at Dec 15, 2013 2:13:04 AM]
[Dec 15, 2013 2:10:07 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Odd result

Sgt. Joe, I think this work unit was sent out around the same time as changing mcm1 to 7.28 version. If so, then what I speculate happening is that user 1 requested a work unit but did not download the work, then i reset the boinc feeder. Since it as never downloaded it switched to version 7.28. Pure speculation though on my part. Too many lines in the log to sift through to find an exact cause.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Dec 16, 2013 8:23:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7844
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Odd result

Thanks for the reply.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Dec 16, 2013 11:06:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread