Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1774 times and has 5 replies Next Thread
TimGatty
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Post Count: 9
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Average work units done has dropped dramatically

Now averaging 435 on one computer and 418 on another. What could explain this ?
[Oct 30, 2013 9:00:50 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average work units done has dropped dramatically

Different computers, different WUs, Pending validation or verification, Errors, etc... and any combination of those.
That makes about umpteen possibilities, maybe more, perhaps less. smile

By the way is the dramatic drop the 17/435 (3.9 %) that you show ? laughing
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Oct 30, 2013 9:48:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TimGatty
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Post Count: 9
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average work units done has dropped dramatically


By the way is the dramatic drop the 17/435 (3.9 %) that you show ? laughing



What do you mean by that ? What 17/435?
[Oct 30, 2013 10:06:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7844
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average work units done has dropped dramatically

I suspect that in addition to the factors JM Bouiller has mentioned, the most obvious one is that the average length of a WU has increased. I presume you are running FAAH. Depending on the batch, I have seen some batches average about 1.2 hours and other batches average up to 2.75 hours ( over 100% longer. This alone could account for the varying numbers of WU you are showing.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Oct 30, 2013 10:31:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average work units done has dropped dramatically

What do you mean by that ? What 17/435?
I was trying to do what I could with what you have provided:
- average has dropped dramatically
- 435
- 418.

Anything else I have missed in your post? smile

Actually I was kidding you, hoping that you would realise that nobody can explain anything relevant with such a cryptic post as your opening one.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Oct 31, 2013 12:46:49 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average work units done has dropped dramatically

I suspect that in addition to the factors JM Bouiller has mentioned, the most obvious one is that the average length of a WU has increased. I presume you are running FAAH. Depending on the batch, I have seen some batches average about 1.2 hours and other batches average up to 2.75 hours ( over 100% longer. This alone could account for the varying numbers of WU you are showing.
Cheers

To re-inforce what Joe says see this
[Oct 31, 2013 5:54:12 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread