...yup, shorter again

KevinN[eo]Reed has an [Smartphone]implant which responds perpendicular to what the Fortrix 'feeds' him [it's got one of these IBM mini joysticks somewhere in between the Jay and Kay keys at that, with a loose spring]. There's an ART [Average Return Time] lapse rate in the system. When one says "they're getting longer", another with a cache of 3 days won't see that reflected in actual processing times, might even see the ones momentarily being processed getting shorter. Then when the longer ones do get their turn, the tasks have become shorter again [those coming out the feeder. Whilst, since the experiments are intermixed both of shorter and longer VINA, depends on the 'now' compound and the protein target, and FAAH runs shorter under one platform, but longer on the other and vice versa for FAHV, the whole 'getting longer / getting shorter', is rather divorced from the gatekeepers reality [Act III].

I keep wondering how the scientists are able to process all of the work completed by WCG. Honestly though, I haven't gotten any new work for other projects for quite some time (including CEP2).

It seems like the computation size is actually fluctuating.