| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 9
|
|
| Author |
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have about 150 FAAH WUs that will normally each be running for about 12 hours on my computer.
----------------------------------------Yesterday I had 12 WUs in my queue with an estimated runtime of about 2 to 3 minutes(!). When I came back today they were all done after 45 minutes with Status "Computation error": 2013-07-15T11:50:11 CEST | World Community Grid | Aborting task faah42749_ZINC58358216_2_xBr27_refmac2_A_PR_01_0: exceeded elapsed time limit 2689.10 (1012889.48G/376.66G) Normal computation of the next 4 WUs was resumed without a problem. There is a problem coming up, though, since there are new FAAH WUs now with an estimated runtime of 2 minutes and 15 seconds(!) and there are 197 of them(!). Before they will start, there are 16 other FAAH WUs waiting to run with an estimated runtime of 9 hours and 45 minutes and one CEP WU with an estimated runtime of 12 hours and 30 minutes. I thought I should mention this because of the recommendation on http://boincfaq.mundayweb.com/index.php?language=1&view=190 Shall I abort all (nearly 200) of the "ready-in-2-or-3-minutes" jobs before they will run or is there someone for whom the short-lived WUs are useful information? [Edit 1 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Jul 16, 2013 1:38:23 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
If you have client 6.10.58, this is kind of fixed in v7, since WCG has implemented <dont_use_dcf>, meaning the client wont adjust projections for the total runtime on Ready to Start work. And yes if a task is meant to run 2-3 minutes, it will 'exceed' the maximum runtime at a preset factor of 10 or 15 from the original.
Suspect, but that's only that one of several, the 'size to power' scheme blundered. It will kick in when the FAAH/SN2S android device stream goes live... maybe they're testing, but surely the techs are not telling [what's new]. Thnx for reporting. |
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks Rob!
Maybe I should have written which version I'm using. It will become clear when I type something like this: $ rpm -qa boinc* Adri |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yup, there's another longer go [multiple reported] bug, where the server communicates a new projected time for a task and everything else in cache adopting that. It was mostly seen during HCC when run in CPU and GPU, but I have/had this frequently on the Linux box with v7 [actually now 7.1.2x is testing]. Linux is much faster than Windows for the VINA engine based projects, but sometimes the slower Windows run time slips through and the TTC explodes the whole cache out of proportion, typically to 4.5 hours, then the next moment [after completion of usually a repair task], all drops back to 3 hours. This 2-3 minutes runs havoc. Suddenly you got a pile. And now there's the -hard coded- panic button coming in 7.2.4 and up... you can't have more than 1000 tasks by project [WCG is a project to BOINC], no matter what. There could be yet another cc_config override coming with that so at least you'll be able to get the quota that WCG limits a device to [Don't know what it is ATM]. WCG has quota ''in progress'' set, so devices going bonkers [the server really being at fault IMHO], wont overload... well yours did anyway it appears.
A true deep sigh. |
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Great, I have just aborted some 600 FAAH WUs with a runtime of 2-3 minutes. After doing that I *finally* got reasonable WUs trickling in again (with a runtime of about 13 hours), which should be enough for a long (and warm) weekend worth of computing.
![]() |
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
In total, from 2013-07-24T12:52:19 CEST till 2013-07-29T21:57:24 CEST I have had to abort 853 FAAH WUs with an estimated runtime of about 2 minutes and 15 seconds.
That's about 160 per day. Luckily, I also received 27 FAAH WUs (est. runtime 11 hours per task) and 1 CEP2 WU (est. 13 hours) today, as I had run out of tasks other than FAHV (of which there are some 250 in my queue right now with an est. average runtime of 1 hour). Adri Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz [Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 7] OS: Linux: 3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64 Memory: 3.86 GB physical, 7.81 GB virtual Disk: 47.92 GB total, 26.07 GB free boinc-client-7.0.65-1.git79b00ef.fc19.x86_64 boinc-manager-7.0.65-1.git79b00ef.fc19.x86_64 |
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Earlier this month I installed BOINC on a completely new system and since then I don't see any FAAH WUs with an estimated runtime of about 2 minutes anymore, as seen before and reported here.
Adri Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz [Family 6 Model 60 Stepping 3] OS: Linux: 3.11.4-201.fc19.x86_64 Memory: 7.49 GB physical, 7.51 GB virtual Disk: 102.03 GB total, 29.08 GB free boinc-client-7.0.65-1.git79b00ef.fc19.x86_64 boinc-manager-7.0.65-1.git79b00ef.fc19.x86_64 |
||
|
|
kffitzgerald
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 29, 2011 Post Count: 222 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
after reading this thread I took a look and I am running 6.10.58 on my win home server 2011 (a stripped down 2008r2 version) just WHAT version should I be running? anyone?
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello kffitzgerald,
Since we are not running a GPU project, BOINC 7 is not mandatory. It seems OK, but we have not completed a security vet of the code, so it is not officially recommended. So you get your choice of official WCG BOINC 6.10.58 or BOINC 7.10.65/66. Or you can experiment with recent Beta releases. Lawrence |
||
|
|
|