terianne929, I agree with you entirely. It's far better (in my opinion), for a project to complete cleanly (i.e., to run out of WU's to crunch due to either, the project meeting it's goal, or, as in the case of DDDT2, for the project scientists to realise that the application performing the crunching, isn't quite up to the job needed), as opposed to financial reasons.

I just hope that, if/when finance is available again (even if that's a year or three down the road), that the project will be able to be picked up from where it left off - so as to continue finding potential cures against malaria.