Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 16
Posts: 16   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 10972 times and has 15 replies Next Thread
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Sep 1, 2007
Post Count: 56
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW November 2012 Project Status Update

Thanks for the update! Appreciated.

Best of luck with the research.

(I'd be pleased to add to my eight years if more processing is required.)

Edited for typo.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by astroWX at Nov 25, 2012 9:40:09 PM]
[Nov 25, 2012 9:37:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
johncmacalister2010@gmail.com
Veteran Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Nov 16, 2010
Post Count: 799
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW November 2012 Project Status Update

Thank you for the project update, always apprecieted and very interesting findings. You know where to find us again if needed... :)


Ditto, here.
----------------------------------------


crunching, crunching, crunching.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro (part time)


smile
[Dec 5, 2012 2:13:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
idimitro
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 21, 2010
Post Count: 3
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused Re: C4CW November 2012 Project Status Update

Thanks for the update.
Does it mean that due to the overlooked effect the already crunched results are irrelevant?
May be it is my poor understanding on the subject confused
[Dec 18, 2012 2:30:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
l_mckeon
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Post Count: 439
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW November 2012 Project Status Update

Thanks for the post.

Does the effect seem to be real or is it an artifact of the simulation, and how can you tell?

If it's real, is it good or bad for the use of these nanotubes for filtration?
[Dec 19, 2012 6:22:29 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
johncmacalister2010@gmail.com
Veteran Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Nov 16, 2010
Post Count: 799
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW November 2012 Project Status Update

Any news at all on the results? How close are we to a water purification process using carbon nanotubes?
----------------------------------------


crunching, crunching, crunching.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro (part time)


smile
[Mar 21, 2013 12:54:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3295
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW November 2012 Project Status Update

Thanks to the World Community Grid volunteers, now we have accumulated a huge amount of data from simulations which we believe could tell us what happens when water flows through carbon nanotubes at flow rates that are typical of real filters, which means in the range 0.1 to 1 m/s. To do this with high precision requires averaging data over millions of simulations.

During the past few months, we've been focusing on trying to understand an unusual and unexpected effect which we observe when analyzing all this data. The effect we see is fairly regular oscillations of the flow resistance at the interface between the water and the nanotube, as a function of the flow rate. Recently, our team was able to make substantial progress in understanding this interesting observation. From further analysis, we believe that the there is a coupling between the flowing water and phonons – which are a sort of collective oscillation of atoms - within the carbon nanotubes. This coupling seems to play an important role at low flow rates (e.g. < 5 m/s). Since all previous studies focus on much higher flow rates, this was easy to overlook. To better understand this effect, we are currently carrying out several comparative simulations. We will let you know as soon as we have more definitive results, which we hope can be before the end of the year. Depending on the outcome, we'll take stock and decide whether we may need to do further simulations with C4CW.

Thanks again to everyone for your cooperation, and patient support of this research effort.

The C4CW Team



Any news on the science results and on whether or not there will be a new target?
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Falconet at May 4, 2013 8:03:20 PM]
[May 4, 2013 8:01:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 16   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread