Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 12
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3432 times and has 11 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused Engineers' accuracy?

How about showing a few less decimal places in the statistics? Of course, not real high priority, but carrying things to five decimal places seems ..... well, embarrassing.
[Jul 23, 2005 8:52:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

If that is the most important problem that you have found so far then life is really sweet on this forum..... biggrin cool
[Jul 24, 2005 7:31:29 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

Right. That's why I didn't mention it last November.
[Jul 25, 2005 2:23:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

There are 5 zeros? Where? biggrin (Yes, I do live under a rock... a protein crunching rock to be exact... wink )
[Jul 25, 2005 3:20:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

Here are the 5 decimal places. Not important but . . . excessive.
Global Statistics
Averages:
***
***
Points Per Hour of Run Time 25.06467
Points Per Calendar Day 9,314,520.78964
Points Per Result 249.54310
Results Per Calendar Day 37,326.30097
[Jul 25, 2005 3:45:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

is a little over the top one thinks, maybe only 2 d.p. is needed - if any
[Jul 28, 2005 2:17:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gordoma
Veteran Cruncher
Windsor, UK
Joined: Jul 21, 2005
Post Count: 729
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

Hmmm! Maybe for the big hitters it may not be so useful, but I'm sure there are plenty of people who only submit a result now and again? Perhaps they need the decimals to follow that?

Although as you say, if they need to follow it to the 100,000th of a result per hour then you might wonder whether the data they are contributing is really valid any more (making assumption about WU timeouts there)?

----------------------------------------
[Jul 28, 2005 2:26:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

I thought that was a compromise.

retsof
Avg. Results Per Calendar Day 1.66667
smile laughing smile smile smile smile smile

The google calculator routinely gives you eight places.

I just got here to WCG. Lessee. 5 results in 3 days...
5 / 3 = 1.66666667
smile laughing smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile

http://calculator.com is 16 places for several supplied calculators.
5 / 3 = 1.6666666666666667
smile laughing smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile smile

http://www.math.com/students/calculators/calculators.html standard calculator gives 16 places and their scientific calculator gives 14 places. What's scientific about that?

The Bible gives 0 places. In an implied calculation of pi, a circular well 10 cubits across was 30 cubits in circumference.

1 Kings 7:23
‘And he [Hiram on behalf of King Solomon] made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.’

In the 1950s, Friden calculators had 20 positions available in the answer, and you moved the little decimal points by hand.
http://www.oldcalculatormuseum.com/fridenstw.html
It gets worse. Another calculator company had a patent on "single key divide", so not to interfere, Friden's lawyers decided that the users would have to press 2 keys to do a division.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
----------------------------------------
[Edit 13 times, last edit by retsof at Aug 3, 2005 12:31:18 AM]
[Aug 2, 2005 9:11:49 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

On the same issue of decimals, could you please unify the format of presentation of data between the global statistics, user statistics and team statistics.

Take a look for example at this:
Detailed Statistics (my stats)
Statistics Last Updated: 08/09/2005 06:06:02 (UTC) [0 hour(s) ago]

Totals:
Total Run Time (y:d:h:m:s) (Rank) 0:189:14:36:17 (#6 069)
Points Generated (Rank) 114 140 (#6 200)
Results Returned (Rank) 646 (#3 729)

Averages:
Avg. Run Time Per Calendar Day (y:d:h:m:s) 0:001:15:34:14
Avg. Run Time Per Result (y:d:h:m:s) 0:000:07:02:39
Avg. Points Per Hour of Run Time 25,08238
Avg. Points Per Calendar Day 992,52174
Avg. Points Per Result 176,68731
Avg. Results Per Calendar Day 5,61739

and compare it to this:
Global Statistics
Statistics Last Updated: 08/09/2005 06:06:02 (UTC) [0 hour(s) ago]

Totals:
Members 79,747
Devices 128,015
Run Time (y:d:h:m:s) 13,925:272:11:49:36
Points Generated 3,061,869,129
Results Returned 12,398,540

Averages:
Run Time Per Calendar Day (y:d:h:m:s) 42:357:22:55:31
Run Time Per Result (y:d:h:m:s) 0:000:09:50:20
Points Per Hour of Run Time 25.09944
Points Per Calendar Day 9,450,213.36111
Points Per Result 246.95401
Results Per Calendar Day 38,267.09877


In the first set of data (my stats), a comma depicts a decimal point, while in the global stats a comma shows a breaker (every one thousand).
In the second case we have spaces as delimiters for the thousand units (my stats), while in the global stats we have commas to do the same job.

Can you have this unified across the board, even though different teams may be working on the actual programing of the different pages?

IBM - howsaboutsomestandardscompliance wink
[Aug 9, 2005 6:57:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Engineers' accuracy?

Hello RobSab,
Very interesting. This is a 'localization' issue. My statistics all show up using the same default rules. Your statistics are showing up with 'my stats' using local conventions while global statistics are using a default. I remember that the statistics pages are put out on Akamai four times a day, but I do not know the details.

Every post in Suggestions / Feedback is read by the WCG, so I will not make a special post about this. This is the second post in the forum on this subject. Some months back, a new member only read a bunch of small boxes where the statistics were supposed to be.

Good catch, RobSab!
mycrofth
[Aug 9, 2005 12:59:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread