| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 8
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Since the outage I have had lots of these on all my machines, prior to this only one or two per week......related?
|
||
|
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I've had none. What project is it for? Perhaps it's not a general issue and is specific to just one project?
----------------------------------------![]() i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
....sustainable water
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Still getting lots of these.....
![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
As soon as a device has been knocked out of the reliable status for whatever reason ** [to run a ZR science alone], there need to be 5 sequential valids again. Till then, all the ones you had cached before will be flipped to PVer on reporting and checked with a new wingman [which take time to come back]. Also till those 5 sequential valids have logged, any newly cached work is send in quorum 2. As recounted before on the forums, my octo had like 50 of a ZR science in quorum 2 cached / processed before 5 sequential valids were logged and the 51st task came alone. Not going to opine on this [the price of running a single science and one of those that *did* require a second copy to check if valid or not]. This is the design. Running mixed sciences substantially shortens the number before the ZR status is regained. The rating is *per* science.
** without data, no way to assess if there could be a bug in the logic. --//-- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Seems the most likely explanation, all but one seems to have regained the 'reliable' status. It would be nice to know why they were flipped, but it happened over the outage, so I suppose it would be impossible to findout....
![]() |
||
|
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1684 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Honestly, I don't see why "Pending Verification" / "Inconclusive" should be a problem.
----------------------------------------At the end, the large majority of the results will become valid. Cheers, Yves |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well just had another big burst of these on the same machine, which had certainly been set back to reliable, and 95% of the results returned today from it have been marked as inconclusive, with the other 5% being valid, all single replication
![]() |
||
|
|
|