Yup, set my Centrino up, got 2 last night, then in the same server connect cycle these were reported, the fetch call granted another 28 [nightly offline, makes for big fetches]. Me 3 active devices were 'reliable A++' as in getting repairs to do for CFSW under the old version, but it's sheer speculation if a rule was added by the techs or an override.

Crunching on, that what we do.

--//--

cfsw_ 3197_ 03197506_ 2-- 95711 Pending Validation 6/8/12 20:35:05 6/9/12 07:30:31 1.33 17.6 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3239_ 03239708_ 0-- 95711 Pending Validation 6/8/12 20:28:44 6/9/12 07:30:31 1.32 17.6 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3299_ 03299092_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300228_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300023_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:31 6/19/12 07:30:31 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300335_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300677_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300955_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300094_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300446_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300274_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300337_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300744_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300891_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300043_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300119_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300506_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300047_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300657_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300001_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300979_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300397_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300073_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300563_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300310_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300904_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300588_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300031_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300725_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
cfsw_ 3300_ 03300181_ 0-- 95711 In Progress 6/9/12 07:30:32 6/19/12 07:30:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

Anyone disagreeing... call the proprietor

cfsw_ 3182_ 03182826_ 0-- 95711 Valid 6/8/12 08:16:43 6/8/12 23:30:09 6.26 110.3 / 110.3
cfsw_ 3177_ 03177676_ 0-- 95711 Valid 6/8/12 06:30:54 6/8/12 17:17:34 6.23 101.1 / 101.1
cfsw_ 3069_ 03069934_ 0-- 95711 Valid 6/6/12 14:51:03 6/7/12 19:55:26 6.29 102.0 / 102.0
cfsw_ 3069_ 03069746_ 0-- 95711 Valid 6/6/12 14:54:28 6/7/12 19:55:26 6.24 100.1 / 100.1

... definitely 4x faster than the old on this host \o/

Just look on the computers "Application details"-page, and you'll see that the various quotas is for the various applications/plan-class combinations...

Oh, hang on, WCG has still not bothered to upgrade the web-code, so you won't find this page for your WCG-computers....


Now, I'm basing my comments on BOINC-projects that does have upgraded web-code, there you can verify for yourself that things works as it should (and you can also see that it really is "per plan-class"). I've no way to know that kinds of hacks WCG is possibly using that changes the behaviour.

BTW, since WCG is running 2 scheduling-servers, it's even possible one of them is mis-configured and isn't using the per-application quota as it should do. Example, once one server asked computers to defer for N seconds while the others for N + M, meaning after N seconds you got "last request too resent" if hit the other server...

Anyway, have a good summer, I don't have the time to crunch WCG before July at the earliest.

What are some of those BOINC-projects? Are you referring to BOINC-based grids which implement an 'application details' (web) page? Please provide links to some of those projects or sites.

Thanks
;