Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 28
Posts: 28   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 5951 times and has 27 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

The 7970 looks pretty awesome on paper at least.
It seems to be the King of computing. Not so sure about AMD's drivers though...
Have a look at Milkyway@home they have a pretty good grasp of whats good for DP.
http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=2457

The only reason I don't go for AMD right now is because I run Linux and Linux & AMD don't always play nice together. wink
[Apr 24, 2012 1:38:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

I got CCC to work on Ubuntu 10.4 provided I used HDMI. Doesn't like display port. PITA to configure. Ended up giving up and installed win7. Might try it again after 12.4 has been out a bit and the kinks are worked out.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Apr 24, 2012 1:58:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

I would HIGHLY reccomend buying Intel. Always.


Why?

I second that. If you want to see grief, just check the disk drive forums when a new SSD comes out and people with the AMD chipsets are wondering why they crash and get corrupted all the time. And that is apart from the video card problems.
[Apr 26, 2012 1:27:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jack007
Master Cruncher
CANADA
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
Post Count: 1604
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

Wish I had read this article before I bought
a GTX 670...
Luckily i have 3 other computers to consider upgrading
video cards for :)
Oh I have a GTX 560 so I'll leave that alone,
but now going to research the ATI cards and see what I can come up with, maybe pick it up today
----------------------------------------

[May 26, 2012 2:36:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

I see I never reported back in this thread on the Radeon HD 7750. I have been crunching on it for a couple of weeks now and am very satisfied. I had no trouble with installing and running the Catalyst driver and AMD APP SDK under Xubuntu 12.04. The 7750 is about 3 times as fast in crunching as the similar-powered Nvidia GT 430 that I used to have in the same machine.
----------------------------------------

[May 27, 2012 12:17:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

Hello kateiacy
Reference: kateiacy [May 27, 2012 12:17:54 AM] post

Hardware-review sites I have visited regarding the HD7750 are singing the same tune for these cards: a very power-efficient card for both gaming and GPU-computing, with the highest-performance-per-watt at their market-segment. What is stopping these card from doing a slam-dunk for the market-segment they are in -- is the price. The way I see it, slam-dunk or not -- it's the same 2-points for the win, and your lower electricity-bills will continue to confirm that win!

As for the OP's mention of the AMD FX-8120, the performance and the power-efficiency for those chips disappoints. I'd recommend the Intel i5 or i7 instead -- for CPU-computing.
;
[May 27, 2012 1:02:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BSD
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Post Count: 224
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

The AMD HD7770 might just fit the bill:

"Now the 7770 board consumes roughly 80 Watts when gaming. In idle, roughly 10 Watts, and when your monitor shuts down it will throttle down even further towards 3 Watts. That's impressive stuff."
-- guru3d.com

"AMD isn’t hitting particularly amazing price points, it’s not doing anything amazing for performance, but it is doing everything that the previous generation of cards from both companies could do at significantly lower power. As a result, efficiency improves and you get a lot more performance per watt consumed."
-- tomshardware.com
;

Just ordered a MSI R7770-2PMD1GD5/OC "Cape Verde" to replace the invalid WU "Cedar" GPU from Newegg. It's low wattage and with two cooling fans, that will keep the heat and noise down. dancing Hopefully I can get on some of the valid HCC WU fun before they are gobbled up. praying

Edit: spelling d oh
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by BSD at Oct 28, 2012 7:48:19 PM]
[Oct 28, 2012 7:17:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: What to buy

Just ordered a MSI R7770-2PMD1GD5/OC "Cape Verde" to replace the invalid WU "Cedar" GPU from Newegg. It's low wattage and with two cooling fans, that will keep the heat and noise down. dancing Hopefully I can get on some of the valid HCC WU fun before they are gobbled up. praying
That MSI card looks awesome!.. but I'm biased towards efficiency and it just happens that the HD7770 and HD7750 are two of the most energy-efficient GPU cards available now and -- judging by the looks at my done HCC-GPUv6.56-WUs even beat some of the higher-end* AMD cards Pitcaim and Tahiti -- looks to be compute-efficient as well!

Notes:
*Currently BOINC measures the CPU-time of a done GPU-based-WU, so the performance of the CPU obscures the true GPU-only performance-metric of a GPU crunching a GPU-based-WU.
;
[Oct 29, 2012 12:17:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 28   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread