Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 28
Posts: 28   Pages: 3   [ 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7512 times and has 27 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Welcome to another installment of the Crunching Chart series designed to graphically present the daily and 6 months rolling information of contributions made by volunteers at World Community Grid. This is the 20th research or phase undertaken here through distributed computing, gone live on February 22, 2012, taken off in a red streak with a first day validation of nearly 10,000 results using the Autodock VINA simulation engine.

For an overview of the research visit the project information pages. This is a research conducted from Brazil, the second hosted at World Community Grid from this country, the 3rd from the South American continent.

Posts in this forum by the principal investigator, Rosângela Silqueira Hickson Rios, you will find by selecting this link to forum member name rhickson



The chart moniker is WCGSNS

Also visit the project statistics page for twice daily update of computed results.

Other project and overview charts

--//--
[Feb 24, 2012 7:24:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JEklund2
Advanced Cruncher
Finland
Joined: Aug 10, 2006
Post Count: 119
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Sek, the chart shows Feb-12 as the starting date in the lower right corner. Is that a typo or is some betas counted also ? ( or do I have some eyesight problems or old copy or .. )
----------------------------------------

[Feb 24, 2012 4:32:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

"Eye" see that all of the chart the year 2012 was reduced to 2 digits. Think I'll change that to right bottom one to '12.

--//--
[Feb 24, 2012 4:40:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mikey
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 10, 2009
Post Count: 821
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Okay in this chart http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q210/Sekerob/WCGYearsPi1Project.png what do the up or down arrows and the percentage numbers mean on the "daily advance" line mean? I see the arrows pointing up or down and then a number, what does that mean? This has puzzled me for a long time! Thanks
----------------------------------------


[Feb 25, 2012 9:20:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Well, the % daily advance is the percentage of the project that is being completed in a single day. The total amount of course being an estimate. Further, this is averaged over the last 7 days (see the far left and right of this row for legends). The arrow merely indicates whether this statistic is trending up or down in relation to previous numbers.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Feb 25, 2012 9:25:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

would assum up means increase down means decrease. that is how I read it..
[Feb 25, 2012 9:40:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mikey
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 10, 2009
Post Count: 821
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Well, the % daily advance is the percentage of the project that is being completed in a single day. The total amount of course being an estimate. Further, this is averaged over the last 7 days (see the far left and right of this row for legends). The arrow merely indicates whether this statistic is trending up or down in relation to previous numbers.


That's what I was thinking but the up arrow showing 0.12% today and then showing a down arrow and some other number the next day perplexed me. That can be ALOT of people switching from project to project in one day! We complete for instance 0.12% of a project one day and then the next day we lose ground by 0.08%. How does one lose ground on a project when progress is being made is what confused me.
----------------------------------------


[Feb 26, 2012 6:50:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Not progress of project, is amount of WU validated, ie yesterday 100,000 today 90,000 is down 10%
[Feb 26, 2012 10:34:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

biggrin From the comments [and my at times poor comprehension of inglese nuances], the only one understanding it's a trend indicator is Shrubs, not 0.12% up, 0.08% down. Obviously, the projects that have the label ''calendar'', would not have an inter-day change of progress, but those measured on volume, where we know the [current] estimated EOP volume, genuinely do. So to meet the varying interpretational way of thinking, it's no longer the second of the day that computes the interday / week progress [of calendar based advance]. The 0.12% is to many 0.12%, but behind the scene, the values were stored at 6 decimal precision, so comparing 12:00:01 with 12:00:02 would have a bigger progress than 12:00:01 compared to 12:00:00. For those I've changed the formula to 'assume', the same time of the day, no matter what part of the day the charts are generated [mid day charts project to end of day]. Unless there is indication for a project to need more time or less, a progress will print as number such as 0.12%- [flat, not minus, sure to confuse a few ;P]. On what fredski thinks, I'll consider to use the arrow up/down for these projects from the work volume. More work in preceding sliding 7 days is up, less work is down... but not decided whether I'll do that, Just look at the appropriate dashboard section... the run time and tasks completed sections [which is one reason not to revert to breaking out a separate chart that some want to only show the progress and days left... snark prevention measure]. Look at it in context, or don't look at it at all... it's just an over the top hobby ;D

--//--

P.S. SN2S will likely show an up/down until enough data has build... you cant have a stable 7/21/60 day average when there is no 7/21/60 day data at start/end and intermissions. laughing
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 27, 2012 12:43:20 PM]
[Feb 27, 2012 12:34:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mikey
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 10, 2009
Post Count: 821
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Say No To Schistosoma" Crunching Chart

Hmmmm...lots more to the chart than at first glance. Thanks!
----------------------------------------


----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by mikey159b at Feb 27, 2012 2:32:13 PM]
[Feb 27, 2012 2:28:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 28   Pages: 3   [ 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread