| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum
Thread: CCW CPU Performance |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 26
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I'm running the same as granno21, actually, only NOT overclocked, so mine is at the stock 3.3GHz. I have my write to disk set for 60 seconds, even, and am averaging 0.808 per work unit (though these units are HCC right now).
----------------------------------------Once I'm done with these last few HCC ones and get the last 2.1 days of HPF2 for my ruby badge there, will be loading up on C4CW. That way we can see how much difference overclocking to 4.4 really makes. Actually, just looked via CPU-Z and it says I'm using the P67 Pro3 motherboard, and that my RAM is 665 MHz speed right now. So yeah, I'm totally stocked in terms of timings/speeds.  i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home [Edit 1 times, last edit by Bugg at Feb 19, 2012 4:41:03 PM] |
||
|
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well, so far I seem to be averaging 1.05 hours per work unit here on C4CW. Actually, they've all been EXACTLY 1.05 hours each.
----------------------------------------i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yes, C4CW WUs are extremely consistent in running times.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
|
||
|
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yeah, just got a few that went up to 1.06 and 1.07 hours. But I like this kind of job where the run times are so well predicted.
----------------------------------------HCC was quite consistent, too. i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home |
||
|
|
johncmacalister2010@gmail.com
Veteran Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 16, 2010 Post Count: 799 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
My average time is about 1.4h/task
---------------------------------------- crunching, crunching, crunching. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro (part time)  |
||
|
|
granno21
Cruncher Japan Joined: Apr 14, 2011 Post Count: 11 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Anyone have any project work unit run-time stats for the AMD FX processors?
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
Anyone have any project work unit run-time stats for the AMD FX processors? Looks like an average around 1.65 hours, FX8150  Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
granno21
Cruncher Japan Joined: Apr 14, 2011 Post Count: 11 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Anyone have any project work unit run-time stats for the AMD FX processors? Looks like an average around 1.65 hours, FX8150 Do you know what speed the 8150 is running? stock or overclocked? Also, was it running 8 tasks? |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
I always run all threads and I don't overclock. So 8, stock, 16GB RAM (should have minimal impact). This is also my main machine and is often being used for multiple tasks. It's not uncommon for efficiency for WCG to be in the 90-95% range.
----------------------------------------Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
|