Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing Forum: Beta Test Support Forum Thread: BETA Test for GFAM Nov 29 2011 |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 24
|
Author |
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,32165
Please reply any issues with this beta test here. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Got 2 new and 2 old running concurrently. After 1 hour seeing 0.7% performance improvement over the old. Tested different Write to Disk settings [running an alpha client] and confirm the checkpoint write logging adapting for the new version.
Thumbs up. Suppose you did not put in the extra logging as what you did for DSFL? There have been -195 reports for GFAM, albeit not many. --//-- |
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
GFAM already had the additional logging which helped us find some work unit errors in BETA before the project was launched. This saved us from a greater number of errors and drove down the error rate on GFAM. These ligands that caused the problem helped us create a method of testing the ligands before they are sent out to the grid for running. So the main change for GFAM was just the check pointing modification.
Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Linux, Boinc v. 6.10.58 x64, checkpoint interval set to 600 seconds yet checkpoints are happening more frequently.
----------------------------------------11-29-2011 5:02:21 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:07:57 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:13:35 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:19:02 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:21:26 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:23:50 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:26:15 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:28:46 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:31:26 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:34:05 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:36:43 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:39:22 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:42:09 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:44:57 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0424_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 4:58:53 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:07:41 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:16:18 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:24:12 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:32:05 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:39:51 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:47:40 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0451_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 4:58:08 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0337_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:07:14 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0337_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:17:14 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0337_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:27:45 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0337_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:38:03 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_GFAM_x1j3iWt_NDP_2WATs_0000756_0337_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:00:03 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:07:05 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:14:09 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:21:21 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:28:38 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:36:03 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed 11-29-2011 5:43:14 PM [checkpoint_debug] result BETA_DSFL_00000073_0000054_0642_1 checkpointed [Edit 1 times, last edit by BobCat13 at Nov 29, 2011 10:58:30 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Was that set before the task loaded? The task only asks one time at start what the WtD limit is.
--//-- |
||
|
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Was that set before the task loaded? The task only asks one time at start what the WtD limit is. It has been set that way for months. Here is a log snippet of HFCC running before the Betas took over: 11-29-2011 2:55:27 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802870_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:05:48 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802870_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:16:06 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802870_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:26:24 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802870_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 2:56:12 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802911_target-7_0000_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:06:49 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802911_target-7_0000_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:17:28 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802911_target-7_0000_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:28:05 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802911_target-7_0000_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 2:56:17 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802834_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:07:19 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802834_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:18:21 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802834_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:29:24 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802834_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:00:46 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802689_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:10:49 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802689_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:20:50 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802689_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed 11-29-2011 3:30:51 PM [checkpoint_debug] result HFCC_target-7_02802689_target-7_0001_0 checkpointed |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well, I'll be darned, set it to 6 minutes last night, restarted the Linux client and looked through the log this morning and see checkpointing in less that time. Was coincidence then that they had not too short jobs helping to improve the efficiency.
------------------------------------------//-- edit: The ones completed & reported with quorum are valid: BETA_ GFAM_ x1j3iWt_ NDP_ 2WATs_ 0000755_ 0788_ 1-- 1767290 Valid 11/29/11 20:44:09 11/30/11 02:24:39 5.60 BETA_ GFAM_ x1j3iWt_ NDP_ 2WATs_ 0000755_ 0458_ 1-- 1767290 Valid 11/29/11 20:44:09 11/30/11 02:04:06 5.26 BETA_ DSFL_ 00000073_ 0000054_ 0432_ 1-- 1767290 Valid 11/29/11 20:44:09 11/30/11 00:00:45 3.23 [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 30, 2011 7:52:48 AM] |
||
|
pcwr
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Sep 17, 2005 Post Count: 10903 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Returned 5 of 9 Beta WUs.
----------------------------------------4 Valid, 1 PV. Crunching the other 4. Waiting for more. Patrick Update: All 10 Valid. [Edit 2 times, last edit by pcwr at Nov 30, 2011 9:03:24 PM] |
||
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1313 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
No errors. Only Valids and Pendings. Efficiency 99.6% on i7 HT on.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Only got GFAM, no DSFL. Resource usage characteristics seem to be as before and I had no problems. Efficiency does seem to be higher on my slow machine.
|
||
|
|