Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 8
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2550 times and has 7 replies Next Thread
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Anyone loosing time with this project?

On ubuntu 64 11.4, seem to loose around 10 minutes between CPU time and actual time. This machine has a xeon x5650 hex. Currently using 11 threads, 10 on this project and 1 crunching climate prediction. Not sure if climate is the culprit or if it's this project issues. Anyone have this issue?
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Nov 25, 2011 4:18:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
RaymondFO
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 30, 2004
Post Count: 561
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Anyone loosing time with this project?

Mac mini had a huge time gap issue with GFAM and I reassigned the computer to another WU project, rebooted and all is well again.
[Nov 25, 2011 4:27:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
GFAM: Anyone loosing time with this project?

Try reading this [in the GFAM forum]: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,32061

For terminology, actual time is called *elapsed* just as it's header says in BOINC Manager, the time the science was allowed to run.

--//--
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 25, 2011 6:37:42 AM]
[Nov 25, 2011 6:37:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Anyone loosing time with this project?

Bearcat, would that "ubuntu 64 11.4" happen to be the same as, "Ubuntu 11.10 64-bit"?
;
[Nov 25, 2011 9:05:07 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Anyone loosing time with this project?

Ubuntu 11.10 is the next upgrade from 11.4.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Nov 25, 2011 1:33:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Anyone loosing time with this project?

On an old P4 running WinXP SP3 I found that GFAM was about half as inefficient again as DSFL, which surprised me given that the techs have said that they were going to make a change to the code for both these projects so it's presumably identical.

Sorry I don't have the details any more; I already changed that machine to run DSFL only now.
[Nov 25, 2011 2:31:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Anyone loosing time with this project?

Refer to my previous post in this thread give a link to another thread wherein one post says:
We are currently testing a fix for the write to disk issue in our internal Alpha testing environment for both DSFL and GOFAM. If things go well there should be a beta soon.

Thanks,
armstrdj

That's AFAICD the only performance/efficiency improving fix worked on and discussed.

Then, for those who continue to run with the 60 second *Write to Disk* default it won't make a difference anyhow if the fix is applied or not. Only for those that up it to a time that checkpoint writes are skipped... 5 minutes found to be a good number for those shutting down daily, but it can be set much larger for those running 24/7 and plan their boots.

Anyhow, as eluded in that other thread, my Linux 64 bit 11.10 runs 99.2% efficient on DSFL, and a good percent lower for GFAM. Would expect for those with an SSD to easily match that number, given I'm on a > 5 year old Barracuda, albeit with optimized fstab settings in the OS [see other posts of what these are]. My even older W7-32 laptop does over 98% efficiency when left alone.

--//--
[Nov 25, 2011 3:04:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Anyone loosing time with this project?

Just started crunching this project on my win7 PC yesterday (22 threads). Looked at a completed wu and saw less than a minute difference. Currently crunching HCC and this project. Why such a difference between ubuntu and win7? Both 64.
Am waiting on my ubuntu PC (11 threads) to finish crunching a climate prediction wu, then monitor to see if this has anything to do with it.
Seems a bit weird to have this big of difference.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Nov 29, 2011 5:06:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread