Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 62
Posts: 62   Pages: 7   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 13723 times and has 61 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

Hello Chris Holvenstot.
@Agrfan - the original post deals with the AMD Bulldozer/FX line of processors - the new architecture released by AMD just a few months ago ...
I guess that ArgFan is referring to the PMH_UK [Jan 10, 2012 2:05:52 PM] post to which post...

... the knreed [Jan 10, 2012 3:47:42 PM] post (relevant part) replied:
Yours: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Edition, Service Pack 4, (05.00.2195.00) AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) proswssor [x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0]

Anyways, I'd like to think that AgrFan's ...or upgrading to more up-to-date hardware if you continue to have issues may include a suggestion to take a look at the AMD FX chip notwithstanding the issues currently discussed involving the AMD FX chip -- which issues seem to be getting resolved step-by-step, deliberately, willfully, and with enthusiasm smile .

Edit1: I didn't wait for ArgFan's [Jan 12, 2012 1:08:43 AM] response post , but it seems I guessed right on some areas !
;
-------------------
edit1: 2012.01.12Th.0929.utc
;
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 12, 2012 1:29:32 AM]
[Jan 12, 2012 1:20:17 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
AgrFan
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 17, 2008
Post Count: 396
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

Do we know yet if the validation problems with the new AMD processors has been resolved?

@andzgrid - you are correct, I was referring to the PMH_UK posts which are not directly related to this issue.
----------------------------------------

  • i5-10400 (Comet Lake, 6C/12T) @ 2.9 GHz
  • i5-7400 (Kaby Lake, 4C/4T) @ 3.0 GHz
  • i5-4590 (Haswell, 4C/4T) @ 3.3 GHz
  • i5-3330 (Ivy Bridge, 4C/4T) @ 3.0 GHz

[Jan 12, 2012 1:46:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Chris Holvenstot
Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 26, 2011
Post Count: 19
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

@agrfan - I have a single Bulldozer/FX system in my setup for the simple fact that I do software regression testing - If you are looking for throughput you are much better off going with the I7-2600 or even the hex core Phenom II CPUs - the per core performance of the FX CPU is disappointing and less than that achieved with the Phenom II series.
[Jan 12, 2012 8:22:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

For the AMD FX issue for results that were sent out and returned in the past 2 days, 166 were marked valid, 7 invalid and 11 are current inconclusive. There isn't a clear pattern to the 7 invalid and 11 inconclusive results. We are going to have to let a little more time go by so that we can evaluate things with more data.
[Jan 12, 2012 2:41:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

For the 'socket a' AMD "proswssor" issue, results that were sent out and returned in the past 2 days, 40 were marked valid, 1 invalid and 3 are inconclusive
[Jan 12, 2012 2:45:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
davyboy
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 9
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

Still only seeing invalid and inconclusive results for GFAM and DSFL on AMD Interlagos.
[Jan 12, 2012 3:04:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
davyboy
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 9
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

Still only seeing invalid and inconclusive results.
[Jan 17, 2012 2:07:36 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

For the 'socket a' AMD "proswssor" issue, results that were sent out and returned in the past 2 days, 40 were marked valid, 1 invalid and 3 are inconclusive

I think you're seeing this because many of these systems have removed themselves from GOFAM and DSFL. All through both betas and production phases every single unit ran by my XP 2000+ were marked invalid. If you want more data points, I'll load up a unit or two and guarantee you invalids to check.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by KWSN - A Shrubbery at Jan 17, 2012 2:59:16 AM]
[Jan 17, 2012 2:58:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

@KWSN - A Shrubbery: We made a chance to separate out the Athlon processors into their own HR class which is why we saw improvement. The invalid rate was much higher prior to that change. Please test again with your computers.

@davyboy: We just deployed a new change for the AMD 'Family 21' processors on Linux. This should help your success on GFAM and DSFL.
[Jan 17, 2012 3:34:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
davyboy
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 9
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: GFAM: Results on AMD-FX Inconclusive?

Thanks for the attention to this issue, however I still am not seeing any Valid status results.
[Jan 20, 2012 2:56:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 62   Pages: 7   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread