Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 38
Posts: 38   Pages: 4   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 6771 times and has 37 replies Next Thread
yoro42
Ace Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 19, 2011
Post Count: 8976
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

The following WU ended immediately after starting with "Computational Error":

BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0010_ 0-- Rory Error 9/8/11 03:49:47 9/8/11 15:52:08 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
roject Name: Beta Test
Created: 09/08/2011 03:11:17
Name: BETA_BETADSFL_00000053_0000000_0010
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 2
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0010_ 3-- - In Progress 9/8/11 15:54:13 9/10/11 08:32:57 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0010_ 2-- 619 Error 9/8/11 15:52:30 9/8/11 15:53:49 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0010_ 0-- 619 Error 9/8/11 03:49:47 9/8/11 15:52:08 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0010_ 1-- - In Progress 9/8/11 03:49:43 9/12/11 03:49:43 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 0-- Rory Error 9/8/11 03:49:47 9/8/11 15:52:08 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

Project Name: Beta Test
Created: 09/08/2011 03:11:17
Name: BETA_BETADSFL_00000053_0000000_0016
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 2

BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 6-- 619 Error 9/8/11 15:57:09 9/8/11 15:58:45 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 5-- 619 Error 9/8/11 15:54:08 9/8/11 15:55:42 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 4-- 619 Error 9/8/11 15:52:30 9/8/11 15:53:49 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 3-- - In Progress 9/8/11 14:55:20 9/11/11 04:56:27 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 2-- 619 Error 9/8/11 05:02:07 9/8/11 14:54:33 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 0-- 619 Error 9/8/11 03:49:47 9/8/11 15:52:08 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000053_ 0000000_ 0016_ 1-- 619 Error 9/8/11 03:49:46 9/8/11 05:01:49 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
----------------------------------------

[Sep 8, 2011 4:19:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
yoro42
Ace Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 19, 2011
Post Count: 8976
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

Jobs currently running:

World Community Grid 6.19 Beta Test BETA_BETADSFL_00000016_0000000_0222_1 00:33:12 (00:31:03) 8.167 93.49 06:11:48 9/11/2011 8:49:12 PM Running Rory
World Community Grid 6.19 Beta Test BETA_BETADSFL_00000016_0000000_0159_1 00:33:12 (00:31:09) 11.750 93.82 05:33:12 9/11/2011 8:49:12 PM Running Rory
World Community Grid 6.19 Beta Test BETA_BETADSFL_00000032_0000000_0012_1 00:33:12 (00:31:11) 30.625 93.89 02:54:05 9/11/2011 8:49:30 PM Running Rory
World Community Grid 6.19 Beta Test BETA_BETADSFL_00000016_0000000_0486_0 00:33:12 (00:31:20) 6.094 94.38 06:35:28 9/11/2011 8:49:30 PM Running Rory
World Community Grid 6.19 Beta Test BETA_BETADSFL_00000043_0000000_0000_0 00:33:12 (00:31:18) 20.000 94.26 04:14:56 9/11/2011 8:49:47 PM Running Rory
World Community Grid 6.19 Beta Test BETA_BETADSFL_00000002_0000000_0001_1 00:33:12 (00:31:33) 26.250 95.02 03:24:49 9/11/2011 8:49:47 PM Running Rory
----------------------------------------

[Sep 8, 2011 4:27:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

Hello yoro,

As you can see these have 0000000053 (aka target 53). This is now a known target with an issue. I will be sending out later updated targets for the ones listed as bad in my post above.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Sep 8, 2011 4:27:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

Hi, I have one *regular* batch 15 DSFL WU waiting to run:

DSFL_ 00000015_ 0000010_ 0096_ 2--

Will it fail? or are production batches error-free already?
[Sep 8, 2011 5:13:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

Hi Bono,

Please feel free to abort that DSFL_00000015 work unit you have, it will more than likely error out anyways.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Sep 8, 2011 6:35:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

Done. In fact mine was copy "_2" since the two original ended in error. But there's still a fourth copy in progress and now also a fifth waiting to be sent. sad
[Sep 8, 2011 6:48:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
widdershins
Veteran Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Post Count: 674
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

It'd be nice if new betas could be posted in the beta announcement section for those of us who have a watch set on that section to save needing to check the forums a few times a day for info about new tests. wink
[Sep 8, 2011 6:53:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Post Count: 839
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

I have a WU (BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000016_ 0000000_ 0048_ 0) that is still 12 hrs from being done (around 20hrs real time since, it is on my laptop and I only give it 60% CPU cycle). It has already been crunching for 7 CPU hrs, so the WU will take 19 hrs of crunch time. This compared to 1.5 hrs for HCC. So I am guessing the batch 16 is extra long
----------------------------------------

[Sep 8, 2011 7:29:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pramo
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Post Count: 703
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

I have a WU (BETA_ BETADSFL_ 00000016_ 0000000_ 0048_ 0) that is still 12 hrs from being done (around 20hrs real time since, it is on my laptop and I only give it 60% CPU cycle). It has already been crunching for 7 CPU hrs, so the WU will take 19 hrs of crunch time. This compared to 1.5 hrs for HCC. So I am guessing the batch 16 is extra long


Uplingers post regarding sweet 16:) - Sep 8, 2011 9:48:01 AM (EDT)

------------------------------
Test was sent out entirely, with the limited number of results it went out quickly.

it was closer to 53 x 19 x 2 for the results...except some full size workunits for target 16 made it into the mix but this did not change the validity of the test as the 100 ligands that ran on all targets also ran on target 16. It is just extra ligands were run as well at normal length so they appeared longer to members.

Hope that helps,
-Uplinger

--------------------------
----------------------------------------

[Sep 8, 2011 7:39:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1313
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New DSFL Beta

Except the valids and pendings, I also returned 20 of the known error batches.

Will this influence the reliability of my hosts and lead to not sending repairs to that hosts?
----------------------------------------

[Sep 8, 2011 9:51:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 38   Pages: 4   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread