| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
|
| Author |
|
|
luckypants
Senior Cruncher Wales Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 175 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I run WCG on my work laptop which for the past two or three years has reported around 2400 FP MIPS (Whetstone) and around 4500 Integer MIPS per CPU after running CPU benchmarks. Suddenly last week it started reporting 820 FP MIPS and 1628 Integer MIPS. Now when I look in task manager, nothing is eating up CPU to prevent access to the CPU and I'm pretty sure the benchmarks would take other work into account. Task manager shows that work units are getting unfettered access to the CPU and shows 100% CPU utilisation, nearly all to WCG WUs
----------------------------------------So why have I suddenly lost 2/3 of my computing power? It's not like the CPU gets tired or anything.... Any suggestions on things to check / try would be very much appreciated. FYI 29/08/2011 16:49:25 Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9500 @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6] 29/08/2011 16:49:25 Processor: 6.00 MB cache 29/08/2011 16:49:25 Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 nx lm vmx tm2 pbe 29/08/2011 16:49:25 OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Edition, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) 29/08/2011 16:49:25 Memory: 2.98 GB physical, 6.82 GB virtual 29/08/2011 16:49:25 Disk: 186.30 GB total, 137.72 GB free and 29/08/2011 16:49:27 Not using a proxy 29/08/2011 16:49:27 Running CPU benchmarks 29/08/2011 16:49:27 Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 29/08/2011 16:49:58 Benchmark results: 29/08/2011 16:49:58 Number of CPUs: 2 29/08/2011 16:49:58 820 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 29/08/2011 16:49:58 1628 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Maybe you've become un-luckypants ;>) WCG does not do it, but any energy management on your computer would, regardless of WCG since lowest priority science apps would not be considered important enough for the computer management to keep the CPU on it's toes.
Suggest you get a program such as CPU-Z to check if your computer is on maximum cycles. Let us know --//-- |
||
|
|
danogian
Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 36 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Same thing has happened to me with a certain laptop before. Turned out the heatsink was clogged up with dust, so the CPU throttled back to avoid overheating. Laptop heatsinks are usually quite accessible - remove a panel, undo a couple of screws, lift it out, blow all the crud off, put back together again. Job's a good 'un.
----------------------------------------
Core i9-10900K (Comet Lake) - 10C/20T
Core i7-2600 (Sandy Bridge) - 4C/8T Ryzen 7 Pro 3700U (Zen+ Picasso) - 4C/8T Core i5-3320M (Ivy Bridge) - 2C/4T Core2 Duo E8400 (Wolfdale) - 2C/2T ![]() |
||
|
|
luckypants
Senior Cruncher Wales Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 175 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Same thing has happened to me with a certain laptop before. Turned out the heatsink was clogged up with dust, so the CPU throttled back to avoid overheating. Laptop heatsinks are usually quite accessible - remove a panel, undo a couple of screws, lift it out, blow all the crud off, put back together again. Job's a good 'un. Definite possibility and one I had thought about, I'll take a look on the weekend. ![]() |
||
|
|
|