| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: New Set of Beta WU's - FAAH |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 484
|
|
| Author |
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Just got some HPF2 betas.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
  |
||
|
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
For some reason the workunits I loaded for beta had about 350 configured like C4CW, about 350 configured for CEP2 and about 350 with the incorrect disk space. About 15k were configured fine. Once I discovered that, I temporarily stopped the server until I could confirm that other projects weren't being configured wrong (they aren't). I turned it back on again. Is that what produced the "161" error?  |
||
|
|
HutchNYC
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Post Count: 97 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Definitely not a complaint, but thought Kevin would want to know if it was accidental on his part....it appears the max beta's = 1 per
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by HutchNYC at Jul 1, 2011 12:04:28 AM] |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
I think if you look into it further you will find that it is still not exceeding one WU per thread, just add the qualifier per science. It appears to be dealing with each science as a seperate beta and will allow one per thread per project.
---------------------------------------- Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
HutchNYC
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Post Count: 97 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ahhhh....good catch. That makes sense.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7579 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
9 beta units - 3 finished - 2 valid - 1 error (161 file transfer error)
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
trn-XS
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 61 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Still getting a few FAAH and also HPF2 Beta's now
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Got one HPF2 Beta as above, then more FAAH ...
----------------------------------------Think the Opening Post title of this thread requires amendment, at least I've done it to this post so there's no confusion. --//-- PS, the limit lifted or 1 per core/science could be to further increase the momentary loads and see if things hold on the "new download servers". [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 1, 2011 5:21:30 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Still getting a few FAAH and also HPF2 Beta's now Yes, a great way of scooping up betas. Download HPF2 betas while running FAAH betas, then download FAAH beta repair jobs while running HPF2 betas. I'd forgotten how good FAAH is for older machines. My P3/1.4 finished its first one of those faster than any of my P4 machines. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Someone in this thread commented on the number of Beta tasks released in a test [IIRC it was 10k per platform]. The histometer says that the record validations were set on May 22, 2009 with 35,724 results passing approval. That test had 102k results in total. The Beta Announcement forum shows HCMD2 was the one tested.
--//-- |
||
|
|
|