| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
In case it needs investigating, here's a strange Workunit Status. WUs _ 0 thru _ 3 errored out with a download error. However, WU _ 4 has a status of Other (which I've never seen before) and even more strangely it has sent and return times of 01/01/70 00:00:00.
The Workunit Status page has this: Project Name: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 Created: 08/04/11 Name: dg01_c090_pca003 Minimum Quorum: 2 Replication: 2 dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 3-- 640 Error 09/04/11 17:46:19 09/04/11 17:47:44 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 2-- 640 Error 09/04/11 17:46:18 09/04/11 17:47:55 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 1-- 640 Error 09/04/11 17:42:52 09/04/11 17:44:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 0-- 640 Error 09/04/11 17:42:43 09/04/11 17:44:18 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 4-- - Other 01/01/70 00:00:00 01/01/70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 My Result Log page has this: Result Name: dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 0-- <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> WU download error: couldn't get input files: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>dg01_c_g09_c081_to_c090_typeC_restr_defWCG0009GCW.str.gzb</file_name> <error_code>-200</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> ]]> The _ 4 Result Log page has just this one line: Result Name: dg01_ c090_ pca003_ 4-- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sounds like a bad WU, I would not worry about it.
Dates and Time are tracked by the number of seconds since 1/1/1970. Likely there is a 0 value for where the real time was suppose to be it still thinks it is 1/1/1970 |
||
|
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Perhaps the task did not download fully/correctly and it took the default value, 0.
More likely a temporary communication failure than a server issue. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I have seen one like this before, there's nothing to worry about it. I guess the work unit has been manually closed by the techs. The "other" work unit was created as a re-send of one of the error tasks after that, got server-aborted without being sent out to a client - and thus got dummy values.
|
||
|
|
|