Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1235 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
gabranth99
Cruncher
Joined: Mar 1, 2011
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
linux vs windows performance

is it me or is windows faster than linux as on windows it had time remaining 4-5 hours in linux it is 8-9 hours
[Mar 5, 2011 12:43:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: linux vs windows performance

For which science?

Comparing TTC is meaningless as the projected times are highly variable. You need to run dozens,best in dual boot to get any reasonable idea if your setup handles the sciences on what platform faster.

What we know is the Integer dense sciences are handled much better on Linux (HCC e.g.). Floating point barely differs.

Overall, given the more efficient OS that Linux is, throughput is greater on this platform, particularly if the OS GUI has been stopped.

Observations may differ.

--//--
[Mar 5, 2011 1:00:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: linux vs windows performance

I have actually seen ~10% performance difference in the favor of Windows when running all threads on a CPU with hyperthreading:
With eight WCG threads on a HT quad, Win 7 averages 3.0 hours for a C4CW work unit, while Ubuntu 10.10 averages 3.4 hours.

I don't have exact numbers for the four threads scenario, but so far Linux seems to be faster there.

I think it's some sort of scheduling issue - with 8 threads and HT Windows will use all cores 100%, while Linux will leave the last core idle perhaps 50% of the time. I'm not seeing this difference when running less than the maximum number of threads.

But I agree with SekeRob that the 'time remaining' is unreliable, you need to compare actual time for several work units on a project where most of the work units are roughly the same size. (Filter on project in the "results status" view in the web interface, and you see which projects have a fairly stable CPU time and which ones wander all over the place.)
[Mar 5, 2011 1:37:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: linux vs windows performance

is it me or is windows faster than linux as on windows it had time remaining 4-5 hours in linux it is 8-9 hours
It's you
[Mar 5, 2011 1:56:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gabranth99
Cruncher
Joined: Mar 1, 2011
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: linux vs windows performance

is it me or is windows faster than linux as on windows it had time remaining 4-5 hours in linux it is 8-9 hours
It's you



i thought so
[Mar 6, 2011 2:20:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread