Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 7
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 829 times and has 6 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Minimum Project Requirements

Today I compared what I am finding running WUs to the given Minimum Specs for Projects, and there appears to be a massive difference.

C4CW - 400Mb, current WUs running with 80Mb
CEP2 - 1Gb, current WUs running with 80-90Mb

They cant be system needs as other project specs at 250Mb/WU are below whats needed for the O/S alone, so must be the additional load to run them. Yet the reality seems way way lower.

What I am missing? It doesnt look like they take drastically more at different stages of the crunching cycle, as my running figures apply to small percentage done up to 90% done. Just being cautious of getting caught by an aspect I am not aware of, because at present the min specs look to be way over the top.

Regards
Zy
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 12, 2010 6:27:04 PM]
[Nov 12, 2010 6:25:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minimum Project Requirements

Zy,

These requirements FAIU do not reflect the real usages. The line at the top says:

"What are the recommended minimum system specifications?"

Set the BOINC memory and free disk space limits to less than those in the SR table and you're likely not be receiving the relevant tasks (I've tested CEP2 and the message log printed a reason for denial). It's WCGs way to make sure that borderline devices do not run projects that can result in user negative experience.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Nov 12, 2010 6:53:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kskjold
Senior Cruncher
Norway
Joined: May 20, 2008
Post Count: 469
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minimum Project Requirements

Is it possible to override the minimum requirements?
----------------------------------------
[Nov 12, 2010 7:04:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minimum Project Requirements

Woa - just discovered why :)

CEP2 WUs have lept to 145Mb each and still climbing, so on a hex core machine thats a tasty number for 6 of them - come back min spec all is forgiven laughing

Edit:
Looks like they are peaking at 195Mb each, and with them on a staggered start on each core, they will come inside the 1Gb spec on total peak use .... just :) So looks like 1Gb was a good call, could even argue its conservative number for a hex machine.

Regards
Zy
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 12, 2010 9:14:32 PM]
[Nov 12, 2010 8:42:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher
Norway
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 974
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minimum Project Requirements

Is it possible to override the minimum requirements?

Not meeting the minimum "recommended" requirements isn't a problem, since these is often less than the actual limits. Example for CEP2 the actual memory-limit is 750 MB, and not 1 GB.

Not meeting the actual task-limits on the other hand can't be overridden, since the Scheduling-server always checks if meets both disk- and memory-requirements of a task before you've assigned the task.

For both disk-limit and memory-limit the scheduling-server uses your preference-settings, so depending on the limit you're not meeting it's possible changing preferences can help. But, since there's no way to set memory-limit to more than 100%, a computer with only 512 MB installed will never be assigned a 750 MB-task. A computer with 768 MB installed on the other hand can increase to 99%, and therefore get a 750 MB-task.

As for client-side, the disk-limit is a "hard" limit, and any task violating the disk-limit will be aborted by client.

For the memory-limit on the other hand, client uses your preference-setting, and will only abort a task if memory-usage is more than your preference-setting. This means, if a task is specified at 750 MB, and preference is 1.25 GB, you can happily use 1.1 GB memory (violating the task-limit), but if a task uses 1.26 GB memory it will be aborted by client.
----------------------------------------


"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
[Nov 13, 2010 1:28:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Post Count: 1343
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minimum Project Requirements

Nice to see you made it over to WCG Zy. Welcome.
----------------------------------------

[Nov 13, 2010 2:25:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minimum Project Requirements

tyty :)

Have to admit, the only reason I got here in the first place, was to get ready to help my BOINC team on the challenge starting 16th Nov.....

Then, having got here I discovered, for the first time, what WCG was really all about properly, having to focus to get ready for the Challenge - and dang it, you guys have got me hooked laughing

I like the setup a lot and will be good to put the CPUs to use for a tangible end as opposed to some BOINC projects which are fine, but I sometimes wonder why I do it with them (except two - Aqua, thats a neat one working on future Quantum Computer design with a Private Sector Company thats actually developing one; and a good GPU one is GPUGRID - medical/scientific research based on molecular modelling).

Not so here, many worthwhile end goals with a good choice to choose from. Plaudits to Admins/Staff et al, nice job applause

Regards
Zy
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 13, 2010 5:20:53 AM]
[Nov 13, 2010 5:19:38 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread