How long did it really run? The nice thing about the CEP2 and C4CW logs is that the wallclock timestamps are printed. Your job ate through the standard 16 job segments in 13 seconds and Application exited with RC = 0x1 reported indicating your device could not hack it. Ascertain that all system requirements are met to the fullest would be a first step.

The one running here on my duo centrino, seems able to handle, RAM peak use only 74MB, VM use 210MB after 25 minutes

Strange... my reply went swimming. The scientists like to receive all output how ever short it's run, so that 'condition' does not get flagged as an outright error. Certainly there was no model grid building which on my centrino took about 4.5 minutes for the 2 that are now running. Both show 80% efficiency, when the throttle is set to 100% still.

Plz continue to monitor and let us know how kernel time, Page Faulting, PF Delta, VM/RAM uses show on your what I gather to be I7 with 8 concurrent. Gives a good reference for others also later in production and what to expect should this version be OKayed.

I've had one on one machine do that-
Not posting the same starting/skipping bits, as seen earlier in the thread.
The same machine also had an error on either side with this:

<core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code 195 (0xc3)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[07:55:24] Number of jobs = 16
[07:55:24] Starting job 0,CPU time has been restored to 0.000000.
Application exited with RC = 0x2b
[07:57:24] Finished Job #0
called boinc_finish

Fortunately was right on the box and saw it happen! there were also messages saying may need to reset the project. I just rebooted and has been good no further problems.

three pv's before it borked, four since it borked and 4 in progress (not shown).


BETA_ E200363_ 640_ A.24.C19H11NO2SSe.1.1.set1d06_ 0-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 12:18:31 9/15/10 18:46:41 5.76 111.5 / 0.0
BETA_ E200363_ 638_ A.24.C19H11NO2S2.80.4.set1d06_ 0-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 12:18:11 9/15/10 18:14:17 5.36 103.7 / 0.0
BETA_ E200363_ 507_ A.24.C19H11NO2S2.54.3.set1d06_ 0-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 11:58:19 9/15/10 18:46:41 5.87 113.5 / 0.0
BETA_ E200363_ 505_ A.24.C19H11NO2S2.54.1.set1d06_ 1-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 11:58:01 9/15/10 18:14:17 6.01 116.3 / 0.0
BETA_ E200363_ 488_ A.24.C19H11NO2S2.50.4.set1d06_ 1-- Error 9/15/10 11:55:53 9/15/10 12:07:24 0.03 0.6 / 0.6
BETA_ E200363_ 486_ A.24.C19H11NO2S2.50.2.set1d06_ 1-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 11:55:30 9/15/10 12:07:24 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ E200363_ 458_ A.24.C19H11NO2S2.44.4.set1d06_ 0-- Error 9/15/10 11:50:18 9/15/10 11:55:30 0.03 0.6 / 0.6
BETA_ E200362_ 471_ A.24.C18H14N2OSSi2.6.4.set1d06_ 0-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 09:22:18 9/15/10 11:57:59 2.44 47.2 / 0.0
BETA_ E200362_ 469_ A.24.C18H14N2OSSi2.6.2.set1d06_ 1-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 09:21:58 9/15/10 11:55:30 2.36 45.6 / 0.0
BETA_ E200362_ 411_ A.24.C18H13N5S.11.3.set1d06_ 0-- Pending Validation 9/15/10 09:14:53 9/15/10 11:50:18 2.43 47.1 / 0.0

Across all my boxes-Out of almost three pages of pv's those are the only errors I have and it was the machine's fault, it just needed a kick

Here's another strange one.



My result was crunched on a 980x at 4500MHz so something is amiss here.

Here's one I haven't gotten credit for in my Stats but it says it's valid:

BETA_ E200360_ 386_ A.24.C18H12N4OS.34.0.set1d06_ 1-- Lorin Valid 9/15/10 04:54:06 9/15/10 12:06:36 6.89

95.1 / 101.7