Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 12
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3657 times and has 11 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: If pairing doesn't really work...

The discussed "let-it-run" option would be a reasonable idea.


More than reasonable. The 6-12 hour limit is, for many/most machines, completely unnecessary. Machines that are on most of the time don't care whether they have done 1 or 2 or 4 or 10 WUs/day.

More importantly, with whatever was changed in Jul/Aug, around 90% of pre-P4 Intel results in this science are marked invalid anyhow if they don't complete. That's months of CPU time being thrown away for no reason, when it would all be useful if they were simply allowed to complete.
[Oct 31, 2010 2:53:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: If pairing doesn't really work...

Btw. I have some computers without internet access. So I can fetch work on another computer, put the boinc data dir on USB stick and let it run on that computer. Every ten days I have to exchange the data and transfer the results to WCG or other projects.
So optimization is nice but there will always be some losses! E.g. those standalone computers are unknown to any boinc project and therefore cannot be classified at all. But even with an inadequate speed class they get more work done as if they would run idle...
[Oct 31, 2010 7:53:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread