Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 88
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Oh, and thank you WCG for sending me quad 10 repair jobs v 6.08 against No Reply jobs and several Detached of version 6.06. The previous few marked my claim a low-lier, giving nearly double the credit asked for, since the wingman took twice the time for the old version. Will be done in the next 6 hours, provided those No Replies do not report in causing the queued jobs to be Server Aborted :D
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Progressed to 2.77 H/J down from 5.46 or now doing 197% percent of the work as before in the same amount of time and still working off the last of the old version.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7662 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just noticed quite a change since the upgrade to HCC. I have identically configured 3.4gz P4 HT machines. Two of them are on Windows XP and one is on Linux Mint. Prior to the upgrade the amount of time to complete an HCC unit was similar. Now the Windows machines take about 5 hours to complete a unit while the Linux machine takes an average of 3 hours. I do not know what they did, but it appears to have made the Linux configuration much more efficient for this application than any other. Very interesting.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Mine are completing in about 2 hour and 1 or two minutes. Windows 7 64 bit intel 2.8
|
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7662 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mine are completing in about 2 hour and 1 or two minutes. Windows 7 64 bit intel 2.8 With or without HT ? Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
without ht
|
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7662 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
without ht Just still curious about the difference between Linux and Windows. ![]() Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
TimAndHedy
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 27, 2009 Post Count: 267 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
but it appears to have made the Linux configuration much more efficient for this application than any other I have found that it was worthwhile to move my Linux machines completely over the HCC. The points appear to be about the same but it gets a lot more work done. Whoever did the optimization must have been using Linux. |
||
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
Well, I guess that really was a great improvement.
----------------------------------------Let me share my first impressions about it. Test machine: Running Windows Vista Ultimate 32 Bits, processor Intel Quad Extreme QX9770 clock 3.2 GHZ, RAM 4 GB, use BOINC agent release 6.2.28 at same time that some other sciences applications running 24/7 (is a special lab machine used in my researches work). The average time of this machine before the improvement ever was about 3.2 horus per work unit of HCC. Sometimes a little bit less/more. Now, the average time was speed up a lot, with results finished in a range between 1.72-1.86 hours. Take a look at the first results from my test: Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit X0000076780594200611021847_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Pending Validation 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 15:58:18 1.75 37.8 / 0.0 X0000076780586200611021847_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 15:24:47 1.74 37.7 / 42.0 X0000076780636200611021846_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 15:07:42 1.72 37.1 / 37.4 X0000076780643200611021846_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 14:23:50 1.77 38.5 / 41.9 X0000076780644200611021846_ 1-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 14:23:50 1.76 38.1 / 37.7 X0000076780607200611021847_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 13:40:50 1.75 37.9 / 43.3 X0000076780597200611021847_ 1-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 13:12:19 1.78 38.7 / 38.4 X0000076780580200611021847_ 1-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 13:12:19 1.75 38.1 / 35.1 X0000076780603200611021847_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 12:04:47 1.72 37.6 / 42.8 X0000076780587200611021847_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 11:59:05 1.73 37.8 / 36.9 X0000076780642200611021846_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 11:15:11 1.76 38.5 / 37.7 X0000076780504200611021848_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 11:15:11 1.77 38.7 / 44.7 X0000076780635200611021846_ 1-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 07/04/10 10:08:05 1.73 38.0 / 43.5 X0000076780641200611021846_ 1-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 06/04/10 01:15:10 1.86 40.8 / 44.7 X0000076780648200611021846_ 0-- GIBAQX9770F Valid 05/04/10 12:07:54 06/04/10 01:12:46 1.80 39.6 / 39.5 I wonder see the same kind of improvement made in other projects codes, were possible. Have a nice day. ![]() ![]()
Cheers ! GIB@
![]() ![]() Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
The Performance Chart is showing an almost leveling for the average WU runtime but not quite... It's now 2.58 hours project average today versus 5.46 hours before the revision, as in doing 2.12 times as much work in the same amount of time.
----------------------------------------![]()
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
![]() |