| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 20
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sek's *hint* this time is that WCG is very stable. It does not crash and is only occasionally taken down for maintenance and we get advanced notice when that is going to happen. WCG runs spectacularly when compared to just about any other project (gratz to the smart people behind the scenes).
The longest downtime I have seen recently (probably in th last year) is 6 hours ... I have a cache of .35 (8 hours) to make sure I don;t run dry. In some small way I think it helps WCG in general when I turn makeup WUs around quickly. |
||
|
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Oh! with all this crunching I forgot.
----------------------------------------Merry christmas to all of you and my best wishes for you to continue crunching in good health with all your family. ![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Hypernova,
----------------------------------------Look at the My Grid, My Statistics > My Stats History, to see the records of your daily validations. That's the one to use. One line lower you can even get it per active device [Very OT]Have a GTX220, 1gb DDR2 waiting very patiently... CUDA drivers 195.24 WHQL in place, OpenCL ready to run. Snapped up last week for a very snappy price. It says 16 cores on the box, whatever that means, PCI x16 slot user and that's what is being used now by an old GS8300. [/Very OT]
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Dec 9, 2009 1:32:32 PM] |
||
|
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Sekerob,
----------------------------------------you are absolutely right, and it makes me feel much better. Over my famous 9 day period I returned the very nice number of ........................................557 WU and not the 264 as mentioned before. So my validation rate has increased and stands now at : 90% Yeeessssssss ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher Norway Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 974 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
If my reasoning is right then there is no incentive to have very powerful machines crunching. But I suppose I am wrong somewhere. As long as your "very powerful machine" doesn't manage to crunch atleast 50% of all WCG-wu's sent-out each day , you'll reach a "steady-state" there you'll on average crunch X wu/day, and also on average X wu/day will be validated...Instead of having a single machine, more realistically you'll have a large farm of computers crunching under your name. But, as long as you're not responsible for 50% ** or more of total production, there isn't really any problem. It can take a few days from you starts running before you've reached a steady-state, but after you do, you'll get more or less a continous stream of granted credit. There will of course be some daily variations, but if you instead of daily looks on weekly production, there will be less variations, and basically the weekly granted will be directly linked to how much you've crunched. ** Well, in sub-projects that uses Homogeneous Redundancy, if you're using a fairly uncommon cpu-type (or OS), it's possible there aren't really anyone else running it, so you'll either completely block the work-queue in this sub-project (you grabs 50% of the work, and no-one else can get any work since wrong cpu/OS-combination), or project must re-configure so your computers validates eachothers results. So, in practice you'll likely get problems if your computers is nearing 50% of total production in a sub-project, but no-one is even close to reaching this kind of production in WCG. ![]() "I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might." [Edit 1 times, last edit by Ingleside at Dec 9, 2009 8:44:03 PM] |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3010 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
So, in practice you'll likely get problems if your computers is nearing 50% of total production in a sub-project, but no-one is even close to reaching this kind of production in WCG. Not even Mr. Kermit when he had everything powered up for that short time ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
This 50% story is far divorced from reality. Not only that, distribution of quorums is allowed to be to multiple devices of the same member i.e. validation flow would not be impaired. Lastly, homogeneity down to rare CPU's is still rare and might, but improbable and very remotely play only a role for HCMD2. WCG in past has taken such distributions out from eligibility.
----------------------------------------edit: Oh yes, 1 machine, monster... would not get more than currently 300 or so tasks per day. Each of the projects has ~60,000 or more results daily validating. This monster manager needs to negotiate with the techs.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Dec 9, 2009 10:47:41 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Sekerob, you are absolutely right, and it makes me feel much better. Over my famous 9 day period I returned the very nice number of ........................................557 WU and not the 264 as mentioned before. So my validation rate has increased and stands now at : 90% Yeeessssssss ![]() Not clear if you did, but was the 557 the validated count from the stats hist i.e. exclusive of the PV jobs? If not, then do 557 / (54 +557) = 91.1%. How many of the 54 PV were older than 4 days? < 10% it should be.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Dec 10, 2009 7:05:01 AM] |
||
|
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Sekerob,
----------------------------------------I tried now the measure things on a 7 day period which is what My Stats allows. So over the last 7 days I get with My Statistics 498 WU returned and points counted. I understand these are Validated WU's. Of these 349 were returned over the last 4 days. So you have 70% over the last 4 days. If I look at My Device Statistics over the same 4 days period I get 805 WU's returned. But here I suppose it is everything and not only validated one's. Are the In progress WU's also in this total or not? But I must say I still feel there are incoherences in all these numbers. That's not too important anyway. What counts is that I am at 1.84M points and my target is 2Million by the 17th of December which will make exactly 1 year I started crunching. At the beginning it was really little stuff but I am improving. I started with 4 physical cores and no HT and running part time. Now I am at 16 Physical cores and 32 virtual all i7 and all over 3GHz. Of these 16 will run fulltime WCG only so I should reach my year end target. This will be my christmas gift. ![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Device Statistics/History is just a subdivision of the total stats i.e. only that what is valid. If you drill into the active devices and copy the daily values, add them up it should tie back to the overall daily stats. Then if you expand the device filter to show all, in case you have old installs, the sum of those should add back to your My Grid total. The Result Status page is real time whilst the Device/My Grid stats only update twice a day, so those 2 will very rarely tally.
----------------------------------------There's a small but, the overall stats including spill. The servers keep tallying and validating during the statistics compilation. So right now I see in my totals 1 result that validated at 00:05:01 UTC on Dec.10. The WCG overall stats presently include a total spill of 1 year 127 days i.e. 1777 results are included for the cumulative total of WCG as at the 9th, but belonging to the 10th. 12/10/09 1:127:06:49:52 1,139,953 1,777 12/9/09 305:033:20:11:13 259,806,378 407,433 Yes, WCG accounts results better than a bank. Confusing it may be and not really important... the point is, that if you returned a result without a outright error code they will eventually add into your contribution totals, without a shadow of a doubt. Even invalid results add into your stats, but have not seen one myself for a very long time.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|