| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Fight Childhood Cancer Project Forum
Thread: Progress Update |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 29
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Not quite... if there are a very large number of "preferred" crunchers, it will lead to a bigger than average share as is visualized in this chart:
----------------------------------------http://bit.ly/WCGSHR It would be silly to not send work into the feeders if any research share were greater by demand, and have yet to hear from anyone that on the full active sciences that have no technical reason to be slowed, to not get work on a continuous basis. It's all about how much supply is in the the WUrehouse. That's not always gapless for one or the other science.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Nov 5, 2010 10:40:03 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I see, I'm glad my suggestion was useless since the scheduler will have the projects running smoothly, which was my main concern
 |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Not useless :D. Since I'm rather bashful, if it's thought appropriate to sticky the "performance chart" threads at top of each science forum, there'd be always a graph on hand with the latest, incorporating the official and inofficial. E.g. Nico_B updates the official numbers every 1-2 weeks and my "pc" takes the work that was validated, but not yet confirmed by the scientists as having been received in good order. For HCMD2 this means that we're usually about 1-2% ahead of them in crunched work.
----------------------------------------Could put them in kind of a uniform post at the top if the WCG agrees (they'll have to do the sticky part) and have the old crunching chart threads locked. You propose/agree on the elements in the template and if light to maintain...
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Today hit the overall 80% progress for this research, or 60% of the second 3 targets set.
EToC: Early May-ish Crunching On. |
||
|
|
-Tails-
Cruncher Joined: Sep 25, 2010 Post Count: 23 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Great news !
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
  Lawrence |
|||
|
||||
|
I need a bath
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Post Count: 347 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Great. I'm going to try to get one more year in before it finishes.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Sounds great. Should be able to get 5 years in before completion of project.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
 |
||
|
|
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Post Count: 839 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Today hit the overall 80% progress for this research, or 60% of the second 3 targets set. EToC: Early May-ish Crunching On. Does this means that WCG doesn't plan to "recompile" the HFCC code to run faster on windows? I mean when they "recompiled" the code for C4CW, it reduced the time to almost half of before. Uplinger said that they are working on "recompiling" the other projects, but I don't know of what order or the time frame. They might not spend the time on HFCC if it is going to finish in early May, but who knows.  |
||
|
|
|