| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Nutritious Rice for the World
Thread: 67% of claimed credits |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5
|
|
| Author |
|
|
s_grandbois@hotmail.com
Cruncher Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Post Count: 6 Status: Offline |
Hi,
I would like to know why only with Nutritious Rice do I receive aprx. 67% of claimed credits and other projects give what is claimed or more...................................................... |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Don't know to be honest. Tell us a little about your system (CPU/Memory), client version/bit (32/64), platform and paste a list from your Result Status page of your different results. RICE is a light project, so if your claims on other WCG projects is usually close to the claim, for RICE I'd expect it not to be that much different.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
RMau
Cruncher Joined: Feb 6, 2008 Post Count: 44 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I checked the three projects that I'm currently crunching. Not extensively, and not with a calculator. On RICE and HCCC I seem to consistently be granted about 10% fewer credits than claimed. On CMD2, the opposite is taking place. I seem to consistently be granted about 10% more credits than claimed.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
It is expected that different processors and computer systems will run different projects more or less efficiently. Our projects have different memory requirements and do different computations. As a result, some systems based on speed of main memory, L1/L2 Caches, as well as characteristics of the processors themselves will run the projects at different relative rates.
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Just to ascertain that not all architectures are the same, my off the shelf quad on that blazing saddles Vista 32 bit able to handle 3Gb ram:
----------------------------------------R00381_ e1202f9bb7ef5b462eff40fc28e2be6c_ 01_ 003_ 7-- 849476 Valid 10/5/09 10:50:41 10/8/09 07:45:46 7.01 108.2 / 128.3 R00381_ ed6423dd32826cfc5569a4478618ea9b_ 00_ 007_ 17-- 849476 Valid 10/5/09 10:50:41 10/8/09 07:45:23 7.01 108.2 / 116.2 R00381_ ed6423dd32826cfc5569a4478618ea9b_ 02_ 009_ 6-- 849476 Valid 10/5/09 10:50:40 10/8/09 07:45:03 7.00 108.1 / 123.6 R00381_ e1202f9bb7ef5b462eff40fc28e2be6c_ 02_ 001_ 14-- 849476 Valid 10/5/09 10:50:40 10/8/09 07:44:35 7.01 108.3 / 126.4 R00381_ ed6423dd32826cfc5569a4478618ea9b_ 02_ 010_ 15-- 849476 Valid 10/5/09 10:50:41 10/7/09 23:40:34 7.01 108.2 / 108.9 I love it, and my RAC too.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 8, 2009 9:46:12 AM] |
||
|
|
|